Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
I get the desire for it, but they are having issues managing two platforms, the last thing any one needs is for them to dump a port onto a 3rd platform and have to support it.
If it was something that Spike contracted out to another company to port it after the game was already 100% finished and the team had moved on, then I'd have zero objections...but any time before that would be overkill for an already overwhelmed team.
Also, the executives would be pretty incompetent to think a game that hasn't sold well on two platforms will suddenly do well on a third. The decision to port to the Switch passed when Spike decided to port to the PS4, Switch owners just need to accept that.