Far Cry 5

Far Cry 5

檢視統計資料:
此主題已被鎖定
Varacka 2018 年 3 月 29 日 上午 10:31
Why in gods name is there Easy Anti-cheat in a single player game?
What are you thinking ubisoft? It's a singleplayer game and you forced EAC on us? Shame on you. So not only do we have denuvo and uplay to contend with but now EAC? I am personally avoiding this game and any other ubisoft game until this practice is ended!
< >
目前顯示第 91-105 則留言,共 120
⚡DooM⚡ 2018 年 4 月 2 日 上午 5:11 
引用自 Warlocc
引用自 Toj Karin
There are always a chance for idiots when participating with random players. Cheating in MP is just one of many ways to be an idiot.

Also, EAC prevents using custom shader injectors unless being whitelisted, not mentioning other kind of mods. Those shaders and mods are not cheating.

With those two points combined I can draw conclusion that EAC in SP is just a fugged up development decision and should never be the case.

Bingo. Control should be up to the players who they play with and what they do with their game.

He is wrong. Mods and hacks are two different things. Go play any coop game with no anti-cheat and see how dead they have become. People don't want to deal with cheaters just like any other game and you can say that picking people is a work around but then why have random coop in the first place? Matchmaking is supposed to be a random and fast way to find people instead of having to go outside of the game to find players. I'm sure that there will still be a few players who find ways around the anti-cheat to hack the game but at least finding random cheaters will be at a minimum.

Also it is not your game or our game. When buying Far Cry 5, all you did was buy the rights to use the property. You do not legally own the game you purchased on Steam. When you go into a game store and buy a physical copy of a game, all you own is the plastic of the cd and the case. That is the only property that you own. The game developer has the right to revoke that from you. They cannot take the physical disc away from you as it is your property, but they however can make a patch a year from now hindering the game unplayable.
⚡DooM⚡ 2018 年 4 月 2 日 上午 5:16 
引用自 LupisVolk
引用自 Warlocc

That doesn't make sense. How does SP cheating ruin your coop experience?

Even if they cheat in coop, it still doesn't affect you, it's coop.
So glad he brought up Borderlands.

See people would 1. Go into single player. 2. mod in or spawn in high tier guns 3. go into multiplayer and A. use those guns to more or less "ruin" the challange or B. give the modded weapons away like candy, which was a common practice.
Yup, always hated that. My first time playing Borderlands was in coop, since the devs advertised how this game was made for fun coop play. I remember getting to this epic looking boss and being like wow. Then all of a sudden my coop buddy just insta kills the thing and I'm just like the fu.ck? It completely ruined my experience of that boss forever as I never got to experience seeing what happens after that boss once I defeated it the way it should of been defeated. You lose out on going through the difficulty of the challenge and afterwards feeling that great rush once you defeated it and being like "this is my reward" once you see the after effects.
Toj Karin 2018 年 4 月 2 日 上午 5:28 
引用自 Doom1991
引用自 Warlocc

Bingo. Control should be up to the players who they play with and what they do with their game.

He is wrong. Mods and hacks are two different things. Go play any coop game with no anti-cheat and see how dead they have become. People don't want to deal with cheaters just like any other game and you can say that picking people is a work around but then why have random coop in the first place? Matchmaking is supposed to be a random and fast way to find people instead of having to go outside of the game to find players. I'm sure that there will still be a few players who find ways around the anti-cheat to hack the game but at least finding random cheaters will be at a minimum.

Also it is not your game or our game. When buying Far Cry 5, all you did was buy the rights to use the property. You do not legally own the game you purchased on Steam. When you go into a game store and buy a physical copy of a game, all you own is the plastic of the cd and the case. That is the only property that you own. The game developer has the right to revoke that from you. They cannot take the physical disc away from you as it is your property, but they however can make a patch a year from now hindering the game unplayable.
I'm not sure what are you trying to argue as nobody here has said that EAC or any other cheating protector should go from MP. News flash: Co-op IS MULTIPLAYER mode.
⚡DooM⚡ 2018 年 4 月 2 日 上午 5:30 
引用自 Toj Karin
I'm not sure what are you trying to argue as nobody here has said that EAC or any other cheating protector should go from MP. News flash: Co-op IS MULTIPLAYER mode.

News flash: Single player also carries over to multiplayer... Just hack your cheat items into single player and carry them over to multiplayer. That is why Anti-cheat has to be on both.
Shadow 2018 年 4 月 2 日 上午 5:40 
引用自 Warlocc
引用自 Toj Karin
There are always a chance for idiots when participating with random players. Cheating in MP is just one of many ways to be an idiot.

Also, EAC prevents using custom shader injectors unless being whitelisted, not mentioning other kind of mods. Those shaders and mods are not cheating.

With those two points combined I can draw conclusion that EAC in SP is just a fugged up development decision and should never be the case.

Bingo. Control should be up to the players who they play with and what they do with their game.

Except it's not your game, it's Ubisofts.
Kaldaien 2018 年 4 月 2 日 上午 5:42 
News flash: They could just allow us to flag ourselves not interested in multiplayer.

They've done that before.

This is actually something more sinister, to try and encourage microtransaction BS. Nothing more. Ubisoft has implemented EAC the right way in the past.
⚡DooM⚡ 2018 年 4 月 2 日 上午 5:48 
引用自 Kaldaien
News flash: They could just allow us to flag ourselves not interested in multiplayer.

They've done that before.

This is actually something more sinister, to try and encourage microtransaction BS. Nothing more. Ubisoft has implemented EAC the right way in the past.

Here it is. The excuse to push microtransactions. There are better ways to push microtransactions than anti-cheat and I bet you know it. The devs here have been more than kind when it came to microtransactions. They executed it in the same fashion that Battlefield 4 did where you can obtain everything in game but they give the option to unlock things faster with money. Both games make it optional and neither of them push microtransactions on you. I don't know why you anti-gamers are so butthurt over optional microtransactions when there is a lot worse out there by many degrees. I love how you use sinister as if this is the ultimate sin of gaming. You remind me of those political news stations that just talk sh.it out of their as.s to get people riled up for views. What's next? Are you gonna tell me that violent video games cause murder in the world? Lol
Shadow 2018 年 4 月 2 日 上午 5:53 
引用自 Doom1991
引用自 Kaldaien
News flash: They could just allow us to flag ourselves not interested in multiplayer.

They've done that before.

This is actually something more sinister, to try and encourage microtransaction BS. Nothing more. Ubisoft has implemented EAC the right way in the past.

Here it is. The excuse to push microtransactions. There are better ways to push microtransactions than anti-cheat and I bet you know it. The devs here have been more than kind when it came to microtransactions. They executed it in the same fashion that Battlefield 4 did where you can obtain everything in game but they give the option to unlock things faster with money. Both games make it optional and neither of them push microtransactions on you. I don't know why you anti-gamers are so butthurt over optional microtransactions when there is a lot worse out there by many degrees. I love how you use sinister as if this is the ultimate sin of gaming. You remind me of those political news stations that just talk sh.it out of their as.s to get people riled up for views. What's next? Are you gonna tell me that violent video games cause murder in the world? Lol

They aren't even pushing them.
All they do is say 'Hey you can find Silver Bars hidden around in Outposts or buy them if you so desire!' in ONE single tooltip.
Outside of that the only reminder you ever get is seeing the items in the shop and the prestige cost in Silver Bars displayed next to the in-game dollars.

My lord, they truly are sinners!
[sMil3] 2018 年 4 月 2 日 上午 6:00 
Ubisoft wants to sell DLC/Mods.
Shadow 2018 年 4 月 2 日 上午 6:01 
Ubisoft wants to sell DLC/Mods.

They don't need Anti-Cheat or Anti-Piracy measures for that...
[sMil3] 2018 年 4 月 2 日 上午 6:12 
Ubisoft wants to sell DLC/Mods.

They don't need Anti-Cheat or Anti-Piracy measures for that...
Ofc they do. Why would people pay for them then?
glynne 2018 年 4 月 2 日 上午 6:19 
From someone who played GTA Online, I'd rather them have EAC for the multiplayer than the GTA approach which is absolutely nothing.
Varacka 2018 年 4 月 2 日 上午 9:47 
♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ this has exploded! Thanks everyone!
Varacka 2018 年 4 月 2 日 上午 9:48 
引用自 1024
to stop you from cheating
Yeah because that always works so well.
Bobby Digital™ 2018 年 4 月 2 日 上午 9:52 
引用自 Pheare
引用自 Floki
Because they want you spending money in their store to cheat. If you cheat in single player they lose money. The entire point of silver bars and their store is to milk you for all your worth, if you use cheats they lose money. Anyone miss up up down down left right start? Lol

up, up, down, down, left, right, left, right, B, A, start :)

... B,A, select, start
< >
目前顯示第 91-105 則留言,共 120
每頁顯示: 1530 50

張貼日期: 2018 年 3 月 29 日 上午 10:31
回覆: 120