Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
They are better for that time, they are build for it,
Ehm... Have you ever played EUIV or CK2?
They're very different from HOI4.
That's... Nice, I guess?
Why?
Second , there is a huge difference between feudal era and WW2 , you know?
Third , the levies are actually replenishing way too fast , so you are wrong..
CK2 its not for everyone..Its not a map painting game , unlike HOI 4 ( Not saying HOI4 is a bad game )
The people are complaining because they cant go ''Pew pew , bang..Give me your land '' not because the game is bad or broken..
Also , you dont get anything by calling other people idiots just because they have a different opinion..
Instead, I reccomend you to play CK2. A good game, but lot of "role play" stuff, like your ruler getting a disease etc. Same goes with EUIV, but to a lesser degree.
And it's pointless considering EUIV and CKII exist. "Medieval HOIIV" would just be redundant