Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
In the 50's no one understood the long term affects of radiation like they do now. So these fallout shelters were built 35 feet under ground right on top of the be rock. The idea being that the site would most probably take an air burst which would level all but the essential buildings and the essential buildings were designed to to take the blast. Remember these were part of "Operation Crash" and the yields in 1952 when they broke ground on this site were not much past WWII levels yet. So the idea was the workers would shelter, then afterward come back up and fix what was broke on the essential buildings and go back to enriching uranium. Sounds insane but in 1952 it was thought to be feasible. So the bunkers weren't designed for long term use.
But as they experimented and discovered the long term affects or radiation on the body and how the fallout would contaiminate and make regular metals radioactive, and then the increasing yields in the arms race, by the mid-1960'ss the shelters were deemed futile and sealed.
So 6 years ago I got to be one of the first to go back into them and survey them for demolition. Very creepy but amazing experience.
So all those home fallout shelters would be no good in the long run. Now I'm sure places like Norad would be much more survivable but if containment were breached that would be all she wrote and a slow death.
If you want a movie that covers radiation sickness pretty well watch "K-19" about the soviet sub.
A nine month old thread has been reanimated,
Yes I spoted that Robin, You better go grab the Batrereanimateion spray
http://imgur.com/a/vwBoX my drawing of the mechanics. This would make it similar to the seal-n-safe door, thus being slightly more secure, as it would press against the frame, as stated by one of you before. Now like I said, they didn't detail the door frame like it shouldve been, but you can clearly see the steel bars that come out of the door to lock. As well as the extra locks to make sure they dont fall out. I agree that this would not be enough to survive a direct nuclear strike, but within a mile or two, it should hold up pretty well, with minor damage. The outside control panel would be decimated, though.Making it pretty much impossible to enter the vault without another exit/entrance area. This is the vault 111 door, showing the locks on the backside of the 9-cog.
http://imgur.com/a/h4Lf1
Note! I'm not sure if these we're included in vault 101 or similar vaults from previous games, as I only really payed attention to the doors in F4. The wiki states that those used in vault 111 and similar (boston vaults) we're similar to those in DC and what not, but not exact copies.