Instale o Steam
iniciar sessão
|
idioma
简体中文 (Chinês simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Tcheco)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol — Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol — América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polonês)
Português (Portugal)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar um problema com a tradução
Regras e diretrizes para discussões
Denunciar esta mensagem
Not forgetting Fallout 4 had a greatly reduce role playing potential as they merged Skills and Perks into one system which was completely unnecessary not that it was bad, just not a good as the old levelling system, and of course there's the Voiced Protagonist which was probably the biggest mistake of Fallout 4.
Then theres the arguement about them needing a new game engine, and while a newer engine could offer greater visuals and performance the time and money spent making it over upgrading the existing one would surely diminish the quality of the next game.
Do keep in mind that all the Bethesda games you mentioned are more popular and selling better than anything that came before them. ESO and FO76 are big business and Starfield will no doubt be the biggest hit for them yet. From that perspective, Bethesda is clearly doing what the majority want more of.
Maybe it's the vocal minority that's just whiny, opinionated, and ungrateful?
ESO and 76 didnt sell better than Skyrim or Fallout 4 particularly if you count Skyrim Special Edition and now the Anniversary edition, I don't know where you got that idea from, especially since Fallout 76 was put on sale weeks after release because it was so bad
And FO4 was released 6 years ago so let's see what FO76's sales look like in another 4 years, eh?
Besides, that doesn't track the microtransactions built into either ESO or FO76, does it? Bet that adds up quite nicely as well.
The "Premium" subscriptions? $15 a month x 12 months = $180 for one year of those games. How much was FO4 again?
So if you measure success by how much money the company has made, and that's quite literally the only measure of success for any for-profit organization, I'm thinking Bethesda is doing fan-♥♥♥♥♥♥♥-tastic. So good they got bought by Microsoft AND kept their entire studio, unchanged. They basically just got handed a wad of cash for almost nothing.
TL;DR the complaints that these games are losing a certain flair they used to have may be valid, but won't change a thing. This is the direction Bethesda will continue to move in.
Doubly so for a company that wasn't doing it not too long ago.
Says who? "Black mark." Why? That's just more of the "whiny, opinionated vocal minority" I was mentioning earlier.
Microtransactions don't bother me. Hell, they let me play all kinds of games for free while other people pay.
The quiet majority (99%) are just playing the game and spending money without a thought or wonder about the company's business practices, ethics, or intent. It could come out tomorrow that the CEO of Bethesda eats babies and worships C'thulhu and they would lose less sales than the bonus he gets when he leaves the position.
It's just entertainment. It's a literal game. The only question that matters:
Is the game fun? If YES, go to (Spend Money). If NO, go to (Different Game)
Games where lootboxes are thing don't have an upper limit, neither do many mobile games who make money off of people too lazy to do the math. In this case, the company is making money off of people's laziness, or stupidity, or both.
You're getting screwed out of your money whether you realize it or not. If you're happy with that, that's your business. But you're making a mistake if you think that only a "vocal minority" is against microtransactions. Not that it matters, the raw amount of people standing with or against something has no bearing on its ethical implications or logical effects.
Though it seems like your mind was already made up and I doubt anything anyone says will convince you, so believe what you will.
No. That is not the only way microtransactions work. You can buy ESO/FO76 for one price, never pay the subscription, and never spend on the in-game currency and still have access to 100% of the content (barring new expansions, which we have always paid for). I do own ESO, bought the pack that included everything up to Elsweyr (like 3 or 4 expansions) for $20 and never paid another cent for the game.
I don't need to be convinced of this:
It's just objectively true.
Interesting choice of words..
Thy shan't be discontent!!
I don't know about that. FO4 is done being marketed. FO76 is still pushing new content and could for years. I believe it works like ESO, one new expansion a year for ~$40 so the game is being bought again with every expansion.
Also, there are more gamers now than 5 years ago. Bigger market kind of, by default, leads to more sales.