then on saturday it was no longer enough.

Then, there's the monetary value of a single unit of currency. Many countrys don't use decimals much in their prices, and will instead affix low value per
there is this much inflation in the 33000s when there is a unified central currency quite annoying.

The Idea that Keynesian economics has penetrated this far into time is quite baffling. Beeg numbor is

引用自 Stelar Seven：

@Uriel,

I think it's a good system. Enough realism for a fun feel of capitalism without the structural inequality and poverty and abuse.

[quote=GreatPalm
entire ship), so we can have free economics. That would be great

Player economies can be fun, but that's not what Elite is focused on. I'd prefer not to add too much. Free Markets are tremendous

know, is how this thing going to handle itself. Will I have enough speed/agility to feel comfortable in a fight? People say that Fed Corvette is one of most maneuverable big ships out there, what do you
of these ships has an agility of a brick in a vacuum. Of course I can mitigate it a bit with FA off, but there are just 10 times more agile ships as is, with much better capabilities, so why would I be

balance, it would take something like 3 years of absolutely no activity to scuttle it.

That's not taking into account the tritium that is currently aboard... Which at market rate is probably another 10 to
never seen them in this game.

or incentive to keep on doing some menial and boring things jus so that you can get / keep something doesn't matter, the result is the same.

Yeah you've

, but i agree, if it makes PP more fun, then it will be cool. I don't believe it will. It might give PvPers more targets... or maybe not. It might mean there is more PvP going on with a reason... or maybe
only is annoying, so that's why i'm now on the side of splitting the game. Give those who don't like modes their safe space :P where they can grind away in open for powers and let those who are fine with

only.

So if my ship states it can do current 52.59 LY and the route next jump is 50 LY, is it safe to jump or too tight on fuel quantity? [/quote]

If your ship has a 52.59 LY jump range, (there are two
, laden and unladen) then a 50 LY jump is fine. It will eat a chunk of your Fuel sure, but if your ship has a high tier Fuel scoop, and enginneered, you should be able to scoop all your fuel that you just

the movement vector of the target when they are very close to it (all the previous is intended to guarantee accuracy). For example, if there is a target flying towards you and you shoot a missile at it
confident enough to have seen every possible iteration of the scenario that I could give you an assured yes or no. So I'll go with "I don't think so".

One thing that I have observed, however, is that

引用自 Mr.MuchDutch：

You will see why if you read the Blurbusters article :lunar2019coolpig:

Here is a bit: (there is a whole lot more)

The answer is frametime variances
.
“Frametime” denotes how long a single frame takes to render. “Framerate” is the totaled average of each frame’s render time within a one second period.
At 144Hz, a single frame takes 6.9ms to display (the

the Power Plant size, too.

The minimal D shield is still good enough to absorb impacts on landings, if you don't try to slam against a planet. [/quote]

The 3A is 1/2 ton more than the 3D so doesnt

引用自 Gropax：

some where every explorer is screaming why no surface scanner.

My thoughts exactly :)

引用自 neuroperson：

[quote=Dolphin Bottlenose

引用自 atom heart：

What I want is a ship for longer mining, exploration and trade oh and the ability to run away from a fight. I am a direct descendant of brave Sir Robin in The Holy Grail.[/quote will be better for those specific tasks.

For mining & exploration I'd recommend the ASP Explorer. It's a very versatile and light ship with enough hardpoints (6) to set up some good mining equipment and