Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
~War~
------
https://i.imgur.com/T5UmyGZ.jpg
Where:
f is the fuel required (tons)
d is the distance to be travelled (light years)
M_ship is the mass of your ship (tons)
M_opt is the optimised mass of your drive (tons)
l and p are constants defined by the rating and class of your drive, respectively
This governs your maximum range, because your drive cannot consume an unlimited amount of fuel per jump. This is why, if you select a system beyond your maximum range and attempt to jump, the error you get is 'max fuel exceeded'.
Rearranging, we get:
https://i.imgur.com/VEyVV90.jpg
Now we can see more clearly the factors affecting our maximum range. It scales linearly with optimised mass (irrespective of anything else), but any multiplier of maximum fuel is raised to the power of 1/p. The question, therefore, is which gives the higher multiplier: a straight 1.04 (Mass Manager) or 1.1^(1/p) (Deep Charge)? This calls for a spreadsheet! I like spreadsheets.
FSD class p 1.1^(1/p)
2 2 1.049
3 2.15 1.045
4 2.3 1.042
5 2.45 1.04
6 2.6 1.037
7 2.75 1.035
You can now see that they give the same result for a class 5 FSD. Mass Manager would actually have a tiny advantage because M_ship includes the mass of the fuel needed for the jump, but it's already the best choice because it is more efficient.
------
Lol...found all this digging around. My brain is still smoking
o7
~War~
edit: I think it can jump some 56-62 Ly depending on load and fuel
But seriously, Anything lower than class 5 deep charge will get better single jump results, but MM still gives better distance for fuel consumption overall so...
https://s.orbis.zone/ftzg
Yeah, Felicity only gives the increased range for FSD to level 4, right? I'll have to see who has the next upgrade for that....I have the first four with her, but the next is grayed out.
The guardian thing looks like a pain. I may be awhile for that...
~War~
*edit* n/m, Felicity does 5 as well, just need some more reputation with her...
Felicity does Grade 5 of all FSD upgrades. And Increased Range is the only one you should ever pick.
Gotcha. How the heck do you get reputation with her besides just crafting stuff you don't need? More exploration data?
Thanks!
~War~
I got her rep up after a trip to Colonia and back and sold my exploration data to her
You went... 22,000LY... without Grade 5 Increased Range FSD... to unlock something you could have done in a few minutes?
Generally speaking you'll do more hyperspace jumps than engaging supercruise. Basically... you want the FSD range upgrade, always, because it makes your life a lot easier; you can get to places within the bubble (and beyond) a lot quicker.
My ASP-X? 50ly jumps, and that's with a full mining setup (lasers, refinery, limpets, you get the idea). I hop towards Maia in 4 - 6 jumps.
So... second, how to get better reputation. 2 options. First, I see you remembered: cartography data. But second... working on multiple ships. If you upgrade more stuff you'll also gain a better reputation. When I was working with Farseer I had 3 - 4 ships, so I worked on all their FSD's and that helped me increase my reputation as well.
No I got the double engineered fsd without needing farseer I figured when I got back I would sell the data there to unlock her so I could engineer my bigger ships
Why not? People have done the far side of the galaxy in an eagle without any engineering before now.