安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語（日文）
한국어（韓文）
ไทย（泰文）
Български（保加利亞文）
Čeština（捷克文）
Dansk（丹麥文）
Deutsch（德文）
English（英文）
Español - España（西班牙文 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希臘文）
Français（法文）
Italiano（義大利文）
Bahasa Indonesia（印尼語）
Magyar（匈牙利文）
Nederlands（荷蘭文）
Norsk（挪威文）
Polski（波蘭文）
Português（葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙）
Português - Brasil（葡萄牙文 - 巴西）
Română（羅馬尼亞文）
Русский（俄文）
Suomi（芬蘭文）
Svenska（瑞典文）
Türkçe（土耳其文）
tiếng Việt（越南文）
Українська（烏克蘭文）
回報翻譯問題
討論區規矩與守則
12 
檢舉此篇文章
nope.... I've got to the core three times and others have done it many more times... watch the angry joe review and he talks about how someone did it 11 times.... nothing changes, nothing new or different. TBH it sounds like people are trying to justify an unfinished ending.
I can't say I would believe someone attempted to get to the centre 11 times to prove a point. After the second or perhaps the third time I think the point would have been made.
But still, did they just do the same thing 11 times or did they try different things along the way?
nothing to do differently. It all ends the same and nothing along the way will change or change the ending. Yeah there are a few rare things along the way like the useless stargate but that has a chance of spawning no matter what path you take. Just like everything else.
I wanted to try to get all of the achievements but I've been denied the 100% on multiple planets due to bugs already which is discouraging. :-( I suppose I can spend days wandering around irradiated planets to try to get the survivalist badges now that it's supposedly fixed.
You don't need to follow the Atlas path ever in the game, it's only a glorified tutorial. You can freely explore from the first login to the game. So this theory is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥.
IMO where the ball got dropped on the 'potential': For a game that was billed as being full of nearly limitless variation, everything still seems 'similar.' Animals look similar...plants look similar...rock formations look similar from planet to planet to planet; even the terrain variations are similar. Sure the colors are different...but honestly that's about it.
Look at the diversity in our own solar system. There's only a handful of planets that you could even land on let alone find life and/or outposts from aliens. In this game every planet is 'landable,' is inhabitable, has a presence of alien life...every planet.
Every space station looks...the same. The interior of every outpost is basically...the same. Everything is just...the same.
Don't get me wrong, I've enjoyed playing the game, but I simply feel let down by the "okay, let's start you over' aspect of the 'get to the center' drive. I probably should have just read the spoilers and prepped myself for what to expect.
Patch in more persistent terrain modification, base building, dead planets, diversity in structures/stations, and a legit MP component (for those rare occasions where you actually DO find someone else) and they'd keep me on the hook a long time. Now, however, faced with the grind of basically starting over...with no additional incentive or capabilities, well, they've lost me.
Well considering the level of hype involved with this game, I honestly don't think any other "ending" or conclusion would have met that hype.
The devs went with the theory of simulation and ran with it because it interests them. Obviously not everybody shares that as being a good storyline if any, but what would others in here want at the centre?
I'm not taking a stab or defending the devs all that much, I just honestly can't think of anything that would have met the hype.
If it was a self contained virtual world where we ALL could 'live,' build, develop, battle, team up, etc....basically a giant sandbox for us all to play in together...that would be amazing. And I thought that's where this was going...and maybe it is at some point.
The whole 'procedurally generated' thing is great for laying out the real estate that you play in...but that in and of itself doesn't 'make' a game. It is but a tool to quickly create a world (universe in this case) in which a game can unfold. Hopefully someone will come along and take this to the next level.
When the camera zooms all the way out of the galaxy and leaves it you see that its contained inside the Atlas like the red part of this
http://www.technewsworld.com/article_images/story_graphics_xlarge/xl-2016-no-mans-sky-1.jpg
And when it pans over to the next galaxy you see it’s another atlas and it’s to the left of the previous one as if they are all arranged in a circle kind of like a council of atlases.
It would technically be the same as it is now but you would get SOMETHING you haven’t seen before and you would learn SOMETHING new. As in what the galaxy looks like and that its inside an atlas. It could be as simple as putting an outline of the atlas shape around the light coming from the core.
Sounds like the same "Ending" but I like that it adds a little more something to the current one.