Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Pretty sure the brakes were put on that runaway train... and for good reason. To make a splash in the water (speculation on my part: keep the funding coming) with iffy data interpretation--let alone methodology, etc--is bush as well as sadly prevalent.
But, it got the headlines they wanted. For posterity's sake, let's frame it as "scientists claim to have found..."
The paper making the claim about the likelihood for life on that planet is sketchy at best. Lots of self referencing in the citations (which is a bit of a red flag), and they've ignored recent info on the compound that was previously thought to be an indicator for life... It was once thought that it could only be created by biological processes (ie living things), but now they believe it can be produced through other methods
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYjYvKoQVeM