Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Perhaps this will help you: https://nomanssky.fandom.com/wiki/Multi-Tool#Class_Bonuses
Or do all Experimental multi-tools have the exact same % bonuses? If that is the case, comparing multi-tools is much simpler then I currently believe.
A personal example - a good location of turbo cells and the selection of “improvement” modules can expand (in my case) the scanning area to 3700 (with +) steps.
And so if you compare one and the other, then you should only use “basic” (standard) technologies.
Honestly, once two equivalent class tools are fully upgraded, those different bonuses are not very noticeable in actual use. Too a great extent, the hunt for the "perfect" tool becomes just a geek out session and has no meaningful impact on game play. (Still enjoy doing it- but those are the hard facts)
Style, it's where it's at, the only real NMS end game.