Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
P.S. Not worth it.
Worth mentioning though that there is no extra reward for finding all flora or minerals. Only fauna has that. So, I agree with the above poster, for flora and minerals it's not worth the time investment. Unless you just enjoy doing it. Then, have at it.
Spending a ton of time to get that last hard-to-find mineral or plant on a single planet just means you are NOT earning as many units as you would if you had just gone to another planet and started scanning there.
What he said.
Also, it is ridiculously profitable if you also supercharge the scanner upgrades. I keep one multi-tool JUST for scanning in all of my saves, where I supercharge all of the scanner upgrade modules. You can get like 800,000 units for one scan if you do that and have great x-class scanner upgrades.
I've done something like "13/10" flora or "9/8" minerals several times before on many planets. I'm not really sure what is going on there but maybe that has something to do with why it doesn't list an exact limit in the discovery log.
Edit: Haha, I think me and chipmonk posted about the same time with the same info... So yeah, the point is if you're expecting the game to give you a certain 'max number' of plants/minerals for a planet.... the game doesn't have that number for you.