No man's Sky has a 4.8 review score on metacritic...

[Farisa]

Gamers say this game sucks horrible! Go check it yourself.

- poor graphics
- low distance visibility
- annoying pop-in and graphical bugs
- repetive gameplay
- boring
- shallow
- garbage
- disappointed
- empty galaxy
- no settlements
- overhyped
- etc

Source[www.metacritic.com]

[Bogan]

Escrito originalmente por Duke McFishy:

Escrito originalmente por Eretnek:

if you did not laugh at the review i dunno whats wrong with you. it is most likely a troll anyway, no reason to drop your tendies on the ground

Nah I don't care that much, it's just that Metacritic is very easy to abuse. If some forum or group of people decides to bomb review a certain game then there is nothing much to stop it.

Have you seen a couple of years ago what they did to DOTA 2 (not that I care about that game btw.)? "Volvo give Diretide". Yeah....

Sure NMS maybe is nothing more than a 7/10 game, but people need to stop taking the user reviews of Metacritic seriously; especially when the game is a bit polarizing.

I'd rather play the game and trust my own opinion before I trust a review, which i'm glad I did with Fallout 4. Lots of people were saying it was ♥♥♥♥ but I bought it and have loved the crap outta it.

[Dukie]

Escrito originalmente por NSA Carnage:

Escrito originalmente por Duke McFishy:

Nah I don't care that much, it's just that Metacritic is very easy to abuse. If some forum or group of people decides to bomb review a certain game then there is nothing much to stop it.

Have you seen a couple of years ago what they did to DOTA 2 (not that I care about that game btw.)? "Volvo give Diretide". Yeah....

Sure NMS maybe is nothing more than a 7/10 game, but people need to stop taking the user reviews of Metacritic seriously; especially when the game is a bit polarizing.

I'd rather play the game and trust my own opinion before I trust a review, which i'm glad I did with Fallout 4. Lots of people were saying it was ♥♥♥♥ but I bought it and have loved the crap outta it.

Agreed.

[hotzeus1]

I think 2-3 idi ots make more than 1 account and give bad reviews ! 0 Points for this game say all that´s idio ts !!! Sry
Best ragards

[cairogal]

https://www.reddit.com/r/NoMansSkyTheGame/comments/4wv8ql/4chan_is_review_bombing_nms_on_metacritic/

Yeah, I never trust any reviews, especially metacritic (I mean come on look at the amount of 0 reviews, really?).
There are lots of games that I love that got bad or mediocre reviews on Metacritic like Fallout 4 for example, some people just get the urge to hate on a game to appear "edgy", others go into the game expecting something that was never promised and some genuinely didn't like the game simply because it's not their cup of tea.
Should I care? Not really, I'm the only one who decides if a game concept is right for me I don't let people tell me what to spend my money on.

[Samurai]

How about waiting for the game to be out for more than not even a full day until claiming Metacritic User reviews are worth posting a topic about?

[LupisVolk]

Escrito originalmente por Cap'n Fk'n Obvious:

How about waiting for the game to be out for more than not even a full day until claiming Metacritic User reviews are worth posting a topic about?

where's the fun in that. Gotta get the hate hot of the press to trigger the fanboys.

[Igor]

don't give a ♥♥♥♥ about metacritic, this will be the game i wanted it to be and what the devs said it would be, don't care about ps3 graphics, it looks great.

[Dragoon]

Yes reviews should be trusted right? If i had listened to the reviews and and crap people were spewing when Xcom 2 came out I would of never of bought the game because the way people made it out to be was it was a pile of ♥♥♥♥ that had ruined Xcom and some timed missions were too hard, on all the missions, had ruined the game etc etc. Lo and behold people were just kicking up a ♥♥♥♥ storm over nothing and Xcom 2 was a fantastic game and well worth buying on release.

[JackOfAllGames]

Escrito originalmente por ✪ Mank Demes:

Escrito originalmente por JackOfAllGames:

lol, the site doesn't have a single critical review scored yet. The score is incomplete. A bunch of random people from a small sample size have arrived around 5. I'll take MetaCritic seriously once critics weigh in and the sample size is greater.

Well there are two scores so that won't happen lol

Look at Evolve, high critic score and terrible user score.

I'm confused...WHAT won't happen? ...and Evolve has a decent score on Metacritic. Are you saying that Evolve is a bad game and that Metacritic doesn't really mean anything? Not having played Evolve OR paid too much attention to MetaCritic in general, I can't really weigh in much on either. I'm just saying that MetaCritic's score of No Man's Sky is incomplete - not worthy of attention at this point in time.

[ClauTau]

Uff I wanna like this game. I'm in the worst spot right now. I saw more than 6 hours worth of footage of this game, and it's fun, but in all this time...you do the same ♥♥♥♥ over and over and over. It's fun, but it's not something I wanna do for the whole game.

Collect stuff to upgrade stuff so that you can get more stuff to upgrade stuff [...]

Feel's boring.Take Minecraft for example. You do too the same stuff over and over and over, but it gives you something else as a side dish. Red stone for marvelous contraptions, Building design etc etc....what we got in NMS?! Learn a couple of alien words, shoot some pirates (boring way to do it), trade with a metallic safe chest on the wall....that's it.

I'm still hunting footage in hoping of finding something new. Something that won't make me refund this game tomorrow D:

[Samurai]

Escrito originalmente por JackOfAllGames:

Escrito originalmente por ✪ Mank Demes:

Well there are two scores so that won't happen lol

Look at Evolve, high critic score and terrible user score.

I'm confused...WHAT won't happen? ...and Evolve has a decent score on Metacritic. Are you saying that Evolve is a bad game and that Metacritic doesn't really mean anything? Not having played Evolve OR paid too much attention to MetaCritic in general, I can't really weigh in much on either.

The game pretty much died faster than anything which doesn't seem to good for an online only experience.

It only recently got necro'd by going free to play which apparently helped.

[BigOunce]

People seem to spend a lot of energy hating on this game, this game isn't for you just move along. Waiting for the 12th to start my journey, I'll be that one player spending hours on end on my spawn planet.

[D3adlyMole]

This game is not a 60 Euros game at all,it s a "Battleborn" return,just wait 1 month and it will cost 30 Euros

[HoloShaii]

Escrito originalmente por Lobo_Iberico:

Gamers say this game sucks horrible! Go check it yourself.

- poor graphics
- low distance visibility
- annoying pop-in and graphical bugs
- repetive gameplay
- boring
- shallow
- garbage
- disappointed
- empty galaxy
- no settlements
- overhyped
- etc

Source[www.metacritic.com]

Metacritic is an awful website, the whole fact you're using it already shows the level of intellect we're dealing with here. Just try the game for yourself, if you don't like it, refund it.

Bunch of ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ morons on the internet.

[Pupper626]

Well if you stop to think about it, just about every game on day one sucks for the first few weeks until they patch stuff. You can't expect everything to be working from the get-go. Also, this stems back to Hello Games not giving ANY information on this game since its' inception. Like there has been such a lack of info on this game it still looks like it's in pre-production on their website.