Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It has a AMD R7 250 2GB, which when you believe the benchmarks compared to the GTX 480 is a lower performing GPU. So the game might not run that well without a GPU upgrade.
Depends on what you think is cheap.
What kind of fps can you expect? No clue... the game is not out yet.
Really? At 1080p (1920 x 1080) at 60 fps?
I would spend a little more though so you don't run into trouble in the forseeable future.
Yeah that's what I thought. Don't expect miracles from that GPU with No Man's Sky, because it is below minimum requierments.
The higher the resolution the more pixels the GPU has to process, thus the more workload it has. The higher the resolution the sharper the image on screen.
1366 x 768 means that it has to render 1366 pixels times 768 pixels.
You can't go beyond what your screen can actually show, but it has less to do with screen size altough that is part of it. You can always go lower depending on what the game supports but it is going to look really bad.