Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You might make it a sentence, something like, have a look at this: https://gamepedia.cursecdn.com/nomanssky_gamepedia/c/cb/Product_Crafting_Tree.png?version=d535a04e65a8697f68a939b8f9eaac95
Btw, this is probably the 50th guide I've seen on Stasis Devices or Activated Indium farms. I wonder if people buy NMS to be a device manufacturer or mineral farmer.
I find it more fun to do the type of the things that the OP suggests, instead of cobalt flipping or the like.
Why do you think your idea of fun is something more important?
What is so fun about making game currency?
for myself. because it's confusing to look only at the recipes only, and I was wondering how many ressources this costs. so I first made a table where I broke down the recipes into sub-recipes. then I made a list what I needed, then I set up the list in wich order I can create the items.
then I saw it just needed a little paragraph more, then I could post it and ask others what they think.
what they think about the usability and simplicity, not about the fact that it would be the hundred-and-first guide posted to this topic, I was brightly aware of this.
help for new players?
I would say, find your own game and don't look up too much help or you'll spoil your game.
for me, it's more fun to build some devices when I need more units for one or the other task, instead of multiplying chloride for an afternoon.
...or selling the same cobalt over and over. I don't like speculating and I don't want to play my game that way.
and it's even more fun to break down a recipe myself instead of looking up the work of other people, like the graph you posted. yes it's quite nice. I would have had fun creating it myself.
it's fun to clue out a way to build something out of blueprints that are just sitting unconnected aside each other.
and it's fun to have more than one way to get some game currency when you e.g. see a hauler you want to buy, just for fun.
Again, why do you think your idea of fun is more important?
Where EXACTLY did I say my opinion is more valid (i.e. what is considered fun) than that of OP's?
Do you like semantics? Is this the fun part, lol?
The fact that you felt it important to criticize the OP. Why?
Good luck with life. :-)
Whatever
not only that, you implemented I should have known on my own and how do I dare to ask.
you didn't have the guts to say "I think this is bad", you just told me "how to write a better one"
in your second posting you told me why it does not work.
again you didn't have the guts to say "I think this does not work", you simply write "this is why this may not work". you state it is not working.
your complete so called "feedback" is offending and biased against all guides or hints concerning "making some units", for what reason ever.
if you think this is feedback, have you studied at the university of vulgaria?
well, it may be my own fault, to ask in the internet for someones opinion will attract the a$holes like a pile of manure attract flies.
anyhow, it will take a bunch of ships to scrap to get all parts you need.
also, I was looking for a way to make more valuable goods out of those simple ressources I collected a lot of quite simple almost on just passing by.