Installa Steam
Accedi
|
Lingua
简体中文 (cinese semplificato)
繁體中文 (cinese tradizionale)
日本語 (giapponese)
한국어 (coreano)
ไทย (tailandese)
Български (bulgaro)
Čeština (ceco)
Dansk (danese)
Deutsch (tedesco)
English (inglese)
Español - España (spagnolo - Spagna)
Español - Latinoamérica (spagnolo dell'America Latina)
Ελληνικά (greco)
Français (francese)
Indonesiano
Magyar (ungherese)
Nederlands (olandese)
Norsk (norvegese)
Polski (polacco)
Português (portoghese - Portogallo)
Português - Brasil (portoghese brasiliano)
Română (rumeno)
Русский (russo)
Suomi (finlandese)
Svenska (svedese)
Türkçe (turco)
Tiếng Việt (vietnamita)
Українська (ucraino)
Segnala un problema nella traduzione
Regole e linee guida per le discussioni
Segnala questo messaggio
Considering a PS4 Pro can't maintain a locked 60fps with this game, I seriously doubt it.
Compare the minimum specs for Warframe to NMS. There's a world of difference between the two.
It's both actually.
The CPU demands of NMS are vastly underrated by most gamers. Even those who consider themselves somewhat computer hardware literate miss that one a good portion of the time.
In the case of the Switch hardware, it would definitely be the CPU's lack of performance that will always prevent an NMS port over to that platform. But the Switch's GPU is also woefully inadequate as well. We are talking VOXEL Based Graphics here folks in addition to a real time PG engine.
There isn't a single game in the Switch library that uses Voxels to much of a degree at all. Nothing approaching the HUGE degree NMS does. There is a reason for that. They are VERY expensive from a hardware performance standpoint.
Nintendo's own Zelda BOTW game used a tiny portion of Voxels and an equally tiny amount of real time PG in the game's engine. The result was a game that could not run at a locked 60fps at the Switch's modest default resolution. Even though this was Nintendo's Crown Jewel Launch Title debuting its new console hardware.
NMS on Switch would be a ShtShow to the Nth degree. I hold out a tiny bit of hope that Switch 2 might actually get real when it comes to some modern/current day hardware being used. But when I say "tiny", I definitely mean "tiny".
Too many casuals snapped up that console despite its internal components being relic technology from 5-10 years ago. And I am being overly generous in that statement. Some would argue that the core system hardware is closer to 30 year old tech. (GameCube)
Even Ark: Survival Evolved "works" on the switch! Release > November.
https://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2018-10-26-ark-survival-evolved-gets-a-november-release-date-on-switch
But I don't think this is gonna be any fun.
Its also not Voxel based, so a total Apples and Oranges comparison. Which basically 99% of all video games are when compared to NMS. This is why the common statement of "All my other games run great at a locked 60fps" means nothing when discussing performance issues with a user's PC and NMS.
My statement was: If ARK itself runs badly, then NMS will run even worse.
That's why "works" with ".
</facepalm>
Nintendo Switch are for little kiddies like 4-9 years old.
https://www.ntower.de/images/gameGalleryPictures/7357/36445-1166-652-cfd757135cf10231da07cd8a29ec91aab19b1f7e.jpg
Sorry... I obviously interpreted your comment wrong. Didn't pick up on the fact that Ark was an easy, forgiving game to run on other systems compared to the demands of NMS. ;o)
We are obviously on the same page in our criticism of Nintendo's Bonehead decision to use such underpowered, antiquated hardware technology for their latest system.
Nintendo fanboys and girls were gonna buy this system regardless of what the hardware turned out to be. Before the big reveal, I had set aside $500.00 at the time to buy the system, several games and two of the conventional Pro Controllers. (We didn't know the name or the prices of any of the accessories at the time)
That was until I learned that the Switch would be using the outdated Tegra X1 processor instead of the newer and much more capable X2 or something closer to other next gen consoles. Bonehead move #1.
As if things couldn't get any worse... On top of this first Bonehead move, Nintendo in one of their classic One/Two Punches of pure idiocy decided to DOWNCLOCK the X1 from its stock 1Ghz clock speed down to a head scratching 768MHz!
This sealed the deal on this now obvious SHT Sandwich and guaranteed that the Switch was going to be a terribly underpowered console. Incapable of running all but the most forgiving third party titles. And would also struggle with the company's own first party titles.
It was upon learning that last bit of bad news that I threw up my hands in utter disgust and disbelief and transferred my $500.00 Switch allocation back into my savings account permanently.
I haven't been the slightest bit interested in Nintendo since. Which is pretty significant considering I have owned every other Nintendo console made, and purchased all of them new on launch day.
I frankly don't care how many millions of these things they have sold. That only proves what PT Barnum said over 100 years ago. ;o)
Peace. :o)