Instalar o Steam
Iniciar sessão
|
Idioma
简体中文 (Chinês Simplificado)
繁體中文 (Chinês Tradicional)
日本語 (Japonês)
한국어 (Coreano)
ไทย (Tailandês)
Български (Búlgaro)
Čeština (Checo)
Dansk (Dinamarquês)
Deutsch (Alemão)
English (Inglês)
Español-España (Espanhol de Espanha)
Español-Latinoamérica (Espanhol da América Latina)
Ελληνικά (Grego)
Français (Francês)
Italiano (Italiano)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonésio)
Magyar (Húngaro)
Nederlands (Holandês)
Norsk (Norueguês)
Polski (Polaco)
Português (Brasil)
Română (Romeno)
Русский (Russo)
Suomi (Finlandês)
Svenska (Sueco)
Türkçe (Turco)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamita)
Українська (Ucraniano)
Relatar problema de tradução
Why would you want to run in 1920x1080 on a 21:9 monitor when NMS supports 21:9 with just s slight stretching of the graphics?
FTIW, you should be able to run borderless in 1920x1080, but I still don't understand why you would want to.
Depending on the game, sometimes I run in full-screen windowed mode when I run into display issues. As long as it works, I'll take it.
Case in point, running Crysis on 1920x1080 gives the dreaded "input not supported" when I know it can take it. Enter windowed full-screen mode. Solves the issue. I realize it's an older game, just making a point.
No ones bothering to update the mods that fix it anymore so i either hope this new update makes the game more mod friendly or HG have corrected the issue (more the latter than anything)
That is just to funny......
And stretching 16:9 to 21:9 is not a minor distortion, you are stretching everything horizontally by 31%!
Can you post a screenshot that shows the stretching you're seeing in 3440x1440?
And I Pillarboxing IS working. Haven't tried it in the last 5 months. Sorry :(
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1399611454
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1399611486
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1399613798
That is what it should look like. Not perfect, but not horrible.
What an ill-informed comment. Technology moves on, new things arrise. If you're one of the ones happy where you are then fine, thats cool. Everyone else doesnt have to be like you.
Regardless its not "waaaaaaay out there". The ratio is now more popular than ever and is continuing to rise. 90% of games these days support it by default. What i dont get is people like you who feel like they have to make a bashing comment on something that has no relevance to them whatsoever.
and yes i have seen games that run the ratio, a friend of mine has it and honestly, i cant see much benefit between that resolution, and 4k. im sitting on a 2k monitor now and anything beyond feels like overkill for gaming. Media creation and 3d modeling sure they definently have some potential over a standard 4k monitor. but when i can run nearly anything that comes out in 2k or 4k resolution, i dont have to buy a game, and be disappointed that it doesnt run right on my display, then be stuck waiting for support to happen that may never happen.
fact is, an indie dev is not often going to think about making sure it supports up and coming new age wide ass resolutions out of the box. they are gonna get it working in 4k and lower so it will sell copies.
my comment wasnt ment to bash, its a legitimate question following the pattern i notice in the discussions of various games i follow, all indie dev, all have asked this question atleast once. in any AAA game's discussion i've seen it asked maybe once, and an official response was it was being added in the next patch for the game or a seprate patch i forget which, it was long ago.
I'm probably going to get blowback again for saying this, but the only difference I see is that you can't yet get (AFIK) a large 4k display with a high (> 60Hz) refresh rate. I have no problem with 60Hz, but I know that's important to alot of gamers.