Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This may help
So the higher the warp drive the higher chance of finding lots of flora and fauna. G/f, K/M, E, and B/O, cool, but what about the number and second letter. I followed the link in the bottom and it said that the lower the number the hotter the planet, 8 being cold, 1 being hella hot. So 4 would be like the golden place to be with highest chance of beautiful planets?
and then what about the other letter?
hey, yeah, thats the link i checked, i have no idea what any of that means though, those secondary letters
I suppose ill have to google minerals.
I thought i was being smart when i went to check on my home planet. No weather hazards, beautiful landscape, lots of plants and animals. Uk what the system analysis is? Atlas Interface. FFS lmao.
Fervium - Scorched
Spadonium - desert, snow
Temerium - Toxic
Coryzagen - Snow
Candensium - Radioactive
These show up from initial scans, so planets that do not have one of these minerals is a candidate for a safe planet, and a good planet for archives. Correct?
Edit: There have been 2 planets i've visited that are safe during the day and a little cold at night which were Spadonium planets.