安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
It shouldn't, it's only a 20mm which will bounce off tanks all day.
Pretty much the same with a modern APC, even the lesser armored rear part is too much for such a rifle.
As for RWR, the game engine doesn't support blast damage threshold, like a tank would only start to take some blast damage when the blast projectile has at least the strength of an impact nade, thus not being affected by a less powerful hand grenade.
If this would be possible, we could give the Lahti-L39 explosive rounds that would just affect jeeps/trucks.
Basically the design choice was either to make it with blast projectiles which would damage vehicles (also tanks, because of the reason explained earlier) or a very body armor piercing bullet with no blast which is what we decided to go after eventually.
The current mechanics for the Lahti are absolutely horrendous and with that logic, the Barret M107 easily outperforms it.
Give the rounds ability to damage tanks atleast and watch it become a viable, high-demand rare (just like the MG-42 as of now).
EDIT: for crying out loud, it's a ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ ANTI-TANK rifle! Old, but still potent.
Though as someone previously mentioned, it may not have the ability to pierce modern day MBT armor, it can still render some of their vital parts useless. Since the weapon is considered 'Very Rare' and has a super slow chance of even appearing, people won't even want to end up using it unless they have full confidence and want to play a anti-vehicle rifleman support role or whatnot.
Never! :D