Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Steam / moderator's CAN remove postings....including in the 'Guides' section. They just don't unless it's breaking a forum rule. The real problem is....when a guide comes out, bunches of people really like it so, they rate it up and give it stars. So, it moves up in the overall rankings and kind of stays there. After new versions of the game come out, they start becoming outdated and erroneous info. Then someone might post a new guide (more up to date version) yet people fail to rate it up / give it stars so, the old one still sits higher in the rankings. It's kind of a failing system really. About the only thing we can do is put in requests to the Steam client development team for ways it could be improved.
The CORRECT way to do this would be like a "WIKI", and a ranking system for valid contributions, that way all the game info could be consolidated and the trash would sink to the bottom..., instead we have crap like "how to kill a bear"
just some examples of the garbage steam tolerates:
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2920993532
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2929823645
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2926956472
Take these guides out and derate/de-rank the accounts that produced them, that should put a stop to it , once people see they can loose a logarithmic quantity of their account levels.
Oh snap! Why in the world wouldn't steam let the moderators handle postings in the 'Guides' section too I wonder? Just seems like they should be.....if for no other reason but, to take some of the load off themselves. Didn't know the forum moderator's couldn't. Maybe that's a suggestion everyone needs to start submitting to the Client Devs.
Further more , we are talking about the TOP ranking games, not the 95% of garbage that passes for games.
I think 7DTD could be classed as a reasonably high ranking game... and as such accounts should not be able to farm account points & levels with trash postings,
as for "knowing" what is trash..... there are plenty of examples....
I think they do allow officers to moderate guides, depending privileges they have - devs should check it.
https://partner.steamgames.com/doc/marketing/community_moderation/adding_moderators#2
Should be at group permission page - officers should ask devs to log into that. Should be xD
Guides are community created contend - same as artwork or workshop - those can be moderated but guides can't? Would be really strange,
The first guide Razorfish linked to, for example, has been reported 9 times. We can tell by going to the guide and selecting "View All reports". There are over 700 guides, so checking each one this way would take substantial time investment. Moreover, in each of those 9 cases, a member of Steam support cleared the report. And we can all see the guide is still visible. So it's not clear what will actually cross the line in Steam's eyes to warrant taking the guide down.
We do have commands to hide or ban a guide, but the last time we tried it out we got inconsistent results. The reasons provided to hide a guide don't account for things like spam or fishing for points. And even if they did, unlike warning a user for a post they made, there isn't a way to communicate to the user what the problem with their guide was, so they can learn and follow the rules in the future.
So the system is just not fit to task for us to moderate guides. We'll have to leave it up to Steam until they provide something we can practically work with.
So let users decide...., you maybe got 9 reports on the first one , because those are the people who could be bothered, most other just look at the picture & know it is likely garbage...
most of it could be done by a user rating system...
zero ratings, let it stay near the top for a few days, for exposure, but then gradually move it down the ladder, if no ratings.
As regards your comment about oh there is just too many...
let's take your 700 as an example.
so 700 and let's say it takes 10 seconds to visually & quick look them...
700 *10 seconds=7,000 seconds
116.7 minutes ,divided by 60
so approx just under 2 hours... for a single person.
now we are only talking about a quick look, many will pass this visual initial inspection, so it's going to be a lot less time.
then introduce a penalty system as i pointed out above. and most of the crap will self regulate.