Steam installieren
Anmelden
|
Sprache
简体中文 (Vereinfachtes Chinesisch)
繁體中文 (Traditionelles Chinesisch)
日本語 (Japanisch)
한국어 (Koreanisch)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarisch)
Čeština (Tschechisch)
Dansk (Dänisch)
English (Englisch)
Español – España (Spanisch – Spanien)
Español – Latinoamérica (Lateinamerikanisches Spanisch)
Ελληνικά (Griechisch)
Français (Französisch)
Italiano (Italienisch)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesisch)
Magyar (Ungarisch)
Nederlands (Niederländisch)
Norsk (Norwegisch)
Polski (Polnisch)
Português – Portugal (Portugiesisch – Portugal)
Português – Brasil (Portugiesisch – Brasilien)
Română (Rumänisch)
Русский (Russisch)
Suomi (Finnisch)
Svenska (Schwedisch)
Türkçe (Türkisch)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamesisch)
Українська (Ukrainisch)
Ein Übersetzungsproblem melden
This isn't exactly true. When a game's engine isn't optimized to utilize a certain type of technology properly then no matter how beefy your hardware is, the engine isn't going to perform very well. Users with Core i7's and GeForce GTX 700 series cards who are experiencing abysmal performance can attest to this.
I'm not at all surprised, given the state of Ubisoft's PC ports dating as far back as when the original Assassin's Creed ported to PC, and even before then.
A lot of times developers will show up here on the Steam forums to address any issues the people may have who pay their bills. Will they have the balls to show up this time?
I do have an Xbone on pre-order, but I do not intend to purchase AC4 even if it is better optimized for the next gen consoles. After reading the statement from the dev, they have just lost a customer.
See ya Ubi!
Rockstar does offer their products for PC. They just don't do it at launch. Their trend is designing for the platform that owns the majority of the market share at the time, and then putting another year of development and polish into the PC port to be released. The only game of recent they've not made accessable to PC gamers is Red Dead Redemption. Rockstar knows PC ports are not their poison, and they would probably not release for PC instead of releasing some half assed port. I believe they learned their lesson from GTA IV. L.A. Noire and Max Payne 3 were much more polished. They have a reputation to maintain, unlike Ubisoft who will release anything no matter how big of a muck up it is.
As for EA Sports - well, consoles is where the money is right now. They are dominating the market share and have since Xbox 360 and PS3 launched in 2005 and 2006 respectively. EA is about making money, and you're going to get by with making as much money as possible while spending as little as possible. The Tiburon studios that makes EA's sports games decides to operate like that. I'm no EA fan ,but you really can't lame them for going where the money's at. When EA does release a PC port, it's at least half decent and they at least make it look like they put an effort into optimization.
As for your computer running it well - I'd sure as hell hope it does with an FX 8350, 16 GB RAM, and tim GTX 680's. However, there are people with Core i7 3770k's, and GeForce GTX 700 series cards that are NOT able to run it at a playable frame rate. Put yourself in their shoes and I bet you wouldn't be a happy camper right now either.
You don't actually have to own the game to be disgusted with that ♥♥♥♥♥♥ developers attitude towards the PC.
I mean seriously do you respect yourself that little that when a developer looks you in the face and says you arn't worth their time but they still want your money how do you defend it? I can't even be mad at you because I feel so sorry for you.
do you cry about every new game that comes out? I bet you do. Also nice fake news articles.
the best Assasins Creed game I ever played. due to being able to free roam on your bad ass ship. no such thing as being o.p even of you get all the upgrades maxed out. they sent out hunters(big ship with lots of guns) to sink you when your wanted level is high enough. there's also hunting big ass sharks and whales on your tiny row boats.. being drag around while trying to harpoon your prey gets crazy sometimes.
8 core 4.1 ghz processor AMD FX series, 16 gig ram. 3 tb hd on windows 8 / 64 bit.. GeforceGTX 660 ti
If they didn't care than we wouldn't even get a PC port to complain about.
You guys seriously need to relax a little bit. PC gamers complain so much that one day no devs will make PC games because you guys go off on anything you can find. Just play the game and enjoy it. You are only hurting the 12,000 people that are currently enjoying this game when your attitude is a constant attack on games and developers. If it is so bad, why don't you just give up gaming? The answer - it's not really as bad as you would have everyone believe.
I have a EVGA GTX 770 SC, intel i5 4670k 3.4Ghz (overclocked to 4.0GHz) and 16GB DDR3-1866 RAM.
Is it silly of me to expect higher than 35-45 FPS? Or is my system just not good enough?
I fell like Ubisoft doesn't care about their PC customers from this statement made in the interview. Sylvain Trottier spoke on his own, but it makes you wounder if this is what Ubisoft thinks as a whole. I do remember that Ubisoft said earlier this year that they felt that their PC customers where getting the short end of the stick. (At the moment, I can't find this source.)
In till there is action taking place I will not buy an Assassin's Creed game from now on, and if this then to be the case for PC games from Ubisoft; I will boy cott them too.
Mate, I don't want to seem rude, but are you stupid? You act as if people are getting annoyed about silly things. No, the PC customers are not getting annoyed over silly or small things, because when someone has a GTX 780 or GTX Titan and only gets a max of 45 FPS, that IS something of concern and something to be upset and annoyed about!
I have a EVGA GTX 770 SC, intel i5 4670k 3.4Ghz (over-clocked to 4.0GHz) and 16GB DDR3-1866 RAM, yet I only get 35-45FPS, and it even drops down to 25 FPS on heavy moments. How is it that I own a GTX 770 and the game drops down to 25 FPS! So YES, it IS as bad as everyone is making it out to be!
We are not saying the game is bad or looks bad, the game is actually very good. AC4 looks about the same detail as The Witcher 2 at some parts, but the thing is that I get 60+ FPS (never drops below 55FPS) with The Witcher 2 at max detail, and yet I only get 35-45 FPS with AC4... :-\
So if you don't mind me saying, YOU seriously need to relax a little bit, you ignorant man. I really hope you are trolling.