God bless Gaijin for nerfing the 2S38

[vollp]

Our prayers have been answered
To hell with that ♥♥♥♥

[** FINASE **ONE LIFE,LIVE IT]

2S38 should be br. 9.0 . Fortunately, it comes with unlimited ammo belt feed and a more durable fuel tank.

[magazine2]

[Oberst Klink]

It shouldn´t even be in the game as fantasy tank. There isn´t even a fully functional prototype and its ammo doesn´t exist too except from a prototype shell shown on a exhibition. Should have ammo from the 50s if would get near realism.

[Kent-molotok]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Oberst Klink:

It shouldn´t even be in the game as fantasy tank. There isn´t even a fully functional prototype and its ammo doesn´t exist too except from a prototype shell shown on a exhibition. Should have ammo from the 50s if would get near realism.

Bro, then NATO in general should have half as much equipment, and what it has should be twice as bad, and it should be in the USSR branch, since the Swedes have Mi28 and T80u, the USSR should have cv90105 Abrams Leopard , Bradley, and the rest

[Miles "Tails" Prower]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Kent-molotok:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Oberst Klink:

It shouldn´t even be in the game as fantasy tank. There isn´t even a fully functional prototype and its ammo doesn´t exist too except from a prototype shell shown on a exhibition. Should have ammo from the 50s if would get near realism.

Bro, then NATO in general should have half as much equipment, and what it has should be twice as bad, and it should be in the USSR branch, since the Swedes have Mi28 and T80u, the USSR should have cv90105 Abrams Leopard , Bradley, and the rest

Sure bud

[vollp]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Kent-molotok:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Oberst Klink:

It shouldn´t even be in the game as fantasy tank. There isn´t even a fully functional prototype and its ammo doesn´t exist too except from a prototype shell shown on a exhibition. Should have ammo from the 50s if would get near realism.

Bro, then NATO in general should have half as much equipment, and what it has should be twice as bad, and it should be in the USSR branch, since the Swedes have Mi28 and T80u, the USSR should have cv90105 Abrams Leopard , Bradley, and the rest

The hell are you yapping now? Why the hell should Russia get modern NATO equipment? I don't think they've been receiving Leopards and Abrams and stuff 💀

[vollp]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Kent-molotok:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Oberst Klink:

It shouldn´t even be in the game as fantasy tank. There isn´t even a fully functional prototype and its ammo doesn´t exist too except from a prototype shell shown on a exhibition. Should have ammo from the 50s if would get near realism.

Bro, then NATO in general should have half as much equipment, and what it has should be twice as bad, and it should be in the USSR branch, since the Swedes have Mi28 and T80u, the USSR should have cv90105 Abrams Leopard , Bradley, and the rest

And I know that you're referring to (allegedly) captured tanks in the Ukraine-Russia war etc. But, obviously, as a Russia supporter, you're just too ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ stupid to know that your suggestion makes no sense. Sweden has the T-80, Mi-28, etc because they're in use and they've received them from Russia with official contracts... That's totally different from capturing enemy vehicles

[Wandering Flare]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Kent-molotok:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Oberst Klink:

It shouldn´t even be in the game as fantasy tank. There isn´t even a fully functional prototype and its ammo doesn´t exist too except from a prototype shell shown on a exhibition. Should have ammo from the 50s if would get near realism.

Bro, then NATO in general should have half as much equipment, and what it has should be twice as bad, and it should be in the USSR branch, since the Swedes have Mi28 and T80u, the USSR should have cv90105 Abrams Leopard , Bradley, and the rest

Local Man Has No Idea Russia Isn't Fighting Entire NATO, more news at 11.

[Mirage]

We'll have to see if it's actually nerfed or not.

[Mirage]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Venom Thanos:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Mirage:

We'll have to see if it's actually nerfed or not.

I'm more worried about the autoloader, I think it will be a big nerf for USSR top tier, and then poor French lol

As a Japan player they're the only redeeming factor, so it might just kill it entirely.

[Mirage]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Venom Thanos:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Mirage:

As a Japan player they're the only redeeming factor, so it might just kill it entirely.

Thinking about getting the Fuji because of the reload, now has to put it on hold to see how the update goes.

I mean it's just a copy paste Type 90, aside from grinding the tree it's whatever.

[Rinky]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Oberst Klink:

It shouldn´t even be in the game as fantasy tank. There isn´t even a fully functional prototype and its ammo doesn´t exist too except from a prototype shell shown on a exhibition. Should have ammo from the 50s if would get near realism.

the game has plenty of fantasy vehicles

[Oberst Klink]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Rinky:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Oberst Klink:

It shouldn´t even be in the game as fantasy tank. There isn´t even a fully functional prototype and its ammo doesn´t exist too except from a prototype shell shown on a exhibition. Should have ammo from the 50s if would get near realism.

the game has plenty of fantasy vehicles

Yes but most of them have real ammo and not fantasy one and are balanced. The 2S38 should be around 11 to be balanced in its fantasy configuration with its fantasy ammo.

[Oberst Klink]

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Kent-molotok:

โพสต์ดั้งเดิมโดย Oberst Klink:

It shouldn´t even be in the game as fantasy tank. There isn´t even a fully functional prototype and its ammo doesn´t exist too except from a prototype shell shown on a exhibition. Should have ammo from the 50s if would get near realism.

Bro, then NATO in general should have half as much equipment, and what it has should be twice as bad, and it should be in the USSR branch, since the Swedes have Mi28 and T80u, the USSR should have cv90105 Abrams Leopard , Bradley, and the rest

You do know that NATO has much more equipment then russia? Even before they lost 7000 tanks in Ukraine. The NATO stuff ingame is not near its real potential but russian stuff does perform way better ingame then in reality. Maybe you should watch less propaganda.

[SamdalftheGray]

Imagine they add the new modules and it turns out it makes the 2S38 more survivable because its modules for some reason eat entire shells stopping them from hitting ammo or crew :Skull: