War Thunder

War Thunder

View Stats:
vollp Jun 14, 2024 @ 12:50pm
God bless Gaijin for nerfing the 2S38
Our prayers have been answered :steamhappy:
To hell with that ♥♥♥♥
< >
Showing 1-15 of 20 comments
2S38 should be br. 9.0 . Fortunately, it comes with unlimited ammo belt feed and a more durable fuel tank.
magazine2  [developer] Jun 17, 2024 @ 1:43am 
:steamthumbsup:
Oberst Klink Jun 17, 2024 @ 5:10am 
It shouldn´t even be in the game as fantasy tank. There isn´t even a fully functional prototype and its ammo doesn´t exist too except from a prototype shell shown on a exhibition. Should have ammo from the 50s if would get near realism.
Kent-molotok Jun 17, 2024 @ 5:16am 
Originally posted by Oberst Klink:
It shouldn´t even be in the game as fantasy tank. There isn´t even a fully functional prototype and its ammo doesn´t exist too except from a prototype shell shown on a exhibition. Should have ammo from the 50s if would get near realism.

Bro, then NATO in general should have half as much equipment, and what it has should be twice as bad, and it should be in the USSR branch, since the Swedes have Mi28 and T80u, the USSR should have cv90105 Abrams Leopard , Bradley, and the rest
Originally posted by Kent-molotok:
Originally posted by Oberst Klink:
It shouldn´t even be in the game as fantasy tank. There isn´t even a fully functional prototype and its ammo doesn´t exist too except from a prototype shell shown on a exhibition. Should have ammo from the 50s if would get near realism.

Bro, then NATO in general should have half as much equipment, and what it has should be twice as bad, and it should be in the USSR branch, since the Swedes have Mi28 and T80u, the USSR should have cv90105 Abrams Leopard , Bradley, and the rest
Sure bud
vollp Jun 17, 2024 @ 6:12am 
Originally posted by Kent-molotok:
Originally posted by Oberst Klink:
It shouldn´t even be in the game as fantasy tank. There isn´t even a fully functional prototype and its ammo doesn´t exist too except from a prototype shell shown on a exhibition. Should have ammo from the 50s if would get near realism.

Bro, then NATO in general should have half as much equipment, and what it has should be twice as bad, and it should be in the USSR branch, since the Swedes have Mi28 and T80u, the USSR should have cv90105 Abrams Leopard , Bradley, and the rest
The hell are you yapping now? Why the hell should Russia get modern NATO equipment? I don't think they've been receiving Leopards and Abrams and stuff 💀
vollp Jun 17, 2024 @ 6:13am 
Originally posted by Kent-molotok:
Originally posted by Oberst Klink:
It shouldn´t even be in the game as fantasy tank. There isn´t even a fully functional prototype and its ammo doesn´t exist too except from a prototype shell shown on a exhibition. Should have ammo from the 50s if would get near realism.

Bro, then NATO in general should have half as much equipment, and what it has should be twice as bad, and it should be in the USSR branch, since the Swedes have Mi28 and T80u, the USSR should have cv90105 Abrams Leopard , Bradley, and the rest
And I know that you're referring to (allegedly) captured tanks in the Ukraine-Russia war etc. But, obviously, as a Russia supporter, you're just too ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ stupid to know that your suggestion makes no sense. Sweden has the T-80, Mi-28, etc because they're in use and they've received them from Russia with official contracts... That's totally different from capturing enemy vehicles
Wandering Flare Jun 17, 2024 @ 6:34am 
Originally posted by Kent-molotok:
Originally posted by Oberst Klink:
It shouldn´t even be in the game as fantasy tank. There isn´t even a fully functional prototype and its ammo doesn´t exist too except from a prototype shell shown on a exhibition. Should have ammo from the 50s if would get near realism.

Bro, then NATO in general should have half as much equipment, and what it has should be twice as bad, and it should be in the USSR branch, since the Swedes have Mi28 and T80u, the USSR should have cv90105 Abrams Leopard , Bradley, and the rest
Local Man Has No Idea Russia Isn't Fighting Entire NATO, more news at 11.
Mirage Jun 17, 2024 @ 7:11am 
We'll have to see if it's actually nerfed or not.
Mirage Jun 17, 2024 @ 7:21am 
Originally posted by Venom Thanos:
Originally posted by Mirage:
We'll have to see if it's actually nerfed or not.
I'm more worried about the autoloader, I think it will be a big nerf for USSR top tier, and then poor French lol

As a Japan player they're the only redeeming factor, so it might just kill it entirely.
Mirage Jun 17, 2024 @ 7:35am 
Originally posted by Venom Thanos:
Originally posted by Mirage:

As a Japan player they're the only redeeming factor, so it might just kill it entirely.
Thinking about getting the Fuji because of the reload, now has to put it on hold to see how the update goes.

I mean it's just a copy paste Type 90, aside from grinding the tree it's whatever.
Rinky Jun 17, 2024 @ 7:53am 
Originally posted by Oberst Klink:
It shouldn´t even be in the game as fantasy tank. There isn´t even a fully functional prototype and its ammo doesn´t exist too except from a prototype shell shown on a exhibition. Should have ammo from the 50s if would get near realism.
the game has plenty of fantasy vehicles
Oberst Klink Jun 17, 2024 @ 9:59am 
Originally posted by Rinky:
Originally posted by Oberst Klink:
It shouldn´t even be in the game as fantasy tank. There isn´t even a fully functional prototype and its ammo doesn´t exist too except from a prototype shell shown on a exhibition. Should have ammo from the 50s if would get near realism.
the game has plenty of fantasy vehicles

Yes but most of them have real ammo and not fantasy one and are balanced. The 2S38 should be around 11 to be balanced in its fantasy configuration with its fantasy ammo.
Oberst Klink Jun 17, 2024 @ 10:01am 
Originally posted by Kent-molotok:
Originally posted by Oberst Klink:
It shouldn´t even be in the game as fantasy tank. There isn´t even a fully functional prototype and its ammo doesn´t exist too except from a prototype shell shown on a exhibition. Should have ammo from the 50s if would get near realism.

Bro, then NATO in general should have half as much equipment, and what it has should be twice as bad, and it should be in the USSR branch, since the Swedes have Mi28 and T80u, the USSR should have cv90105 Abrams Leopard , Bradley, and the rest

You do know that NATO has much more equipment then russia? Even before they lost 7000 tanks in Ukraine. The NATO stuff ingame is not near its real potential but russian stuff does perform way better ingame then in reality. Maybe you should watch less propaganda.
SamdalftheGray Jun 17, 2024 @ 11:08am 
Imagine they add the new modules and it turns out it makes the 2S38 more survivable because its modules for some reason eat entire shells stopping them from hitting ammo or crew :Skull:
< >
Showing 1-15 of 20 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Jun 14, 2024 @ 12:50pm
Posts: 20