Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Selective realism moment
If you are flying this craft and trying to kill enemy fighters then you and Gaijin are both wrong
Of all the "this does not belong at this BR" threads I've ever seen this is the easiest to say
this does not belong at this BR' I think they might have actually confused the 163 with the 162 which would explain everything
"162 jet BR 6.0"
""163 faster bigger guns BR 8.0"
lol google ME-162 fuel and get ME-163
no other explanation makes any sense at all.
please Gaijn take a look and reevaluate these aircraft. They look a lot like each other but they are not the same.
Me163 was on the edge of Br, Performance,Ammo,Armament,Fuel to make it usable in its current state which is full of uptiers into huge maps against planes which you cannot catch even at full throttle, climbing or in a dive(F3h2,Swift,F86 With Energy ect)
And the Me163bo, dont even get me started. maps so huge you used to waste a ton of fuel just to get blown out of the sky by all aspect missiles because it fights regularly alongside Starfighters Fishbeds Mig23's and more.
Like Honestly.
What Are You Doing?
Okay.. but the game doesn't work like that.. so don't balance it like that.
Yes give the 155mm howitzer with LRF 6 second reload at 7.7, when do I get my T-14 Armata at 1.0 because at that point why does BR even exist?
Noone is demanding that get'S a specific BR, all we want is for a game that advertizes with realistic vehicles models to actually stick to the basic stats of that verhicle and not bring ridicolus arguments like "the video could be speed up" to 25 year old official material that was filmed as part of prooving that it can do what they prommised as it was handed over to the army