War Thunder

War Thunder

View Stats:
< >
Showing 1-13 of 13 comments
Shyue Chou Mar 1, 2024 @ 5:40am 
The Type 90B no less. This is going to be interesting. :mortis:
Mirage Mar 1, 2024 @ 7:18am 
Ctrl C - Ctrl V .. easy 70 bucks.
Chaoslord 87 Mar 1, 2024 @ 8:17am 
Originally posted by Shyue Chou:
The Type 90B no less. This is going to be interesting. :mortis:

I already have the Type 90A. Is there a signifficant difference between the 90A and B?
Qu Rahn Mar 1, 2024 @ 8:58am 
Originally posted by Chaoslord 87:
Originally posted by Shyue Chou:
The Type 90B no less. This is going to be interesting. :mortis:

I already have the Type 90A. Is there a signifficant difference between the 90A and B?
No. It was added so japan had more than a single top tier.
Mirage Mar 1, 2024 @ 9:25am 
They seemingly just want to make 9.0 and 9.3 as miserable as possible so you can't grind it and you have to buy these premiums,
Illusionyary Mar 1, 2024 @ 9:43am 
Originally posted by Chaoslord 87:
Originally posted by Shyue Chou:
The Type 90B no less. This is going to be interesting. :mortis:

I already have the Type 90A. Is there a signifficant difference between the 90A and B?
Functionally no, as mentioned it was basically added to give Japan a better lineup option. It does differ very slightly by having additional 10mm plates on the hull (in real life this is where the mineroller attachment would mount), but these do nothing in-game.
chicks99 Mar 1, 2024 @ 10:16am 
Originally posted by Mirage:
They seemingly just want to make 9.0 and 9.3 as miserable as possible so you can't grind it and you have to buy these premiums,

Yep, Russia 10.0 absolutely ruins 9.0-9.3.

Su25K, 2S38, T72 TURMS, Obj 292, BMP 2M, and now the T80UD.

I avoid 9.3 like the scourge now, even though I bought the Type 16 FPS I'm not using it again until either it gets a better round than the M735 or the matchmaker takes the telephone pole out of it's bum hole.
Last edited by chicks99; Mar 1, 2024 @ 10:21am
Chaoslord 87 Mar 1, 2024 @ 10:17am 
Originally posted by Illusionyary:
Originally posted by Chaoslord 87:

I already have the Type 90A. Is there a signifficant difference between the 90A and B?
Functionally no, as mentioned it was basically added to give Japan a better lineup option. It does differ very slightly by having additional 10mm plates on the hull (in real life this is where the mineroller attachment would mount), but these do nothing in-game.

A filler vehicle like the Type 74 F. Gotcha.
Mirage Mar 1, 2024 @ 10:25am 
Originally posted by chicks99:
Originally posted by Mirage:
They seemingly just want to make 9.0 and 9.3 as miserable as possible so you can't grind it and you have to buy these premiums,

Yep, Russia 10.0 absolutely ruins 9.0-9.3.

Su25K, 2S38, T72 TURMS, Obj 292, BMP 2M, and now the T80UD.

I avoid 9.3 like the scourge now, even though I bought the Type 16 FPS I'm not using it again until either it gets a better round than the M735 or the matchmaker takes the telephone pole out of it's bum hole.

I wanted to get the FPS but it's so stupid to have a modern vehicle get handicapped because they get a 1970s shell for some reason and then endlessly ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ uptiered with the only redeeming factor being gen 3 thermals which obviously does nothing to kill things.
chicks99 Mar 1, 2024 @ 11:44am 
Originally posted by Mirage:
I wanted to get the FPS but it's so stupid to have a modern vehicle get handicapped because they get a 1970s shell for some reason and then endlessly ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ uptiered with the only redeeming factor being gen 3 thermals which obviously does nothing to kill things.

Yep, absurd logic that Gaijin thinks a MCV from 2015 would still be using antiquated APFSDS from 1978. The Tech tree variant at 9.7 gets type 93 APFSDS, while facing basically the same exact matchmaker (always sucked to 10.3), so why can't the FPS?

It absolutely sucks when put into urban combat in War Thunder because of the poor map design. Realistically, it would only be good for ambushes with its speed, but being forced to slog it out in the long narrow corridors against heavily armored and better armed enemies just isn't it.
Mirage Mar 1, 2024 @ 1:10pm 
Originally posted by chicks99:
Originally posted by Mirage:
I wanted to get the FPS but it's so stupid to have a modern vehicle get handicapped because they get a 1970s shell for some reason and then endlessly ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ uptiered with the only redeeming factor being gen 3 thermals which obviously does nothing to kill things.

Yep, absurd logic that Gaijin thinks a MCV from 2015 would still be using antiquated APFSDS from 1978. The Tech tree variant at 9.7 gets type 93 APFSDS, while facing basically the same exact matchmaker (always sucked to 10.3), so why can't the FPS?

It absolutely sucks when put into urban combat in War Thunder because of the poor map design. Realistically, it would only be good for ambushes with its speed, but being forced to slog it out in the long narrow corridors against heavily armored and better armed enemies just isn't it.

Plus you have to uptier all the ♥♥♥♥♥♥ Type 74s along with it which at least get a better shell but are all very lackluster vehicles at their own BR and especially at 10.3
Til_Dovre_Faller Mar 1, 2024 @ 1:18pm 
The japanese tank is like the PT-16/T-14 MOD but better!
Krido Mar 4, 2024 @ 7:57am 
There is already Type-90B in tech tree. This premium is literally copy-paste but with camo net. Its same as Type-16 premium.
Japan already have 3x Type-16...

It would be better if it was unique vehicle like Type 93 jeep but with AT launcher on top.
< >
Showing 1-13 of 13 comments
Per page: 1530 50

Date Posted: Mar 1, 2024 @ 5:24am
Posts: 13