Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Could you please explain me ?
I have some issues to understand your logic
Eventhough it's a mere 1km/h less it still is not historical.
EDIT
Plus, there are other specifications wrong with the panther.
And why is the I185 still in the game?
Still, y'all have to calm down and hope that some things will be subject to further balancing in the future. Plus, I think the Tiger I is much worse off than the Panther, with which I actually have moderate success ingame.
I-185 never flew successfully, killed pilots, had three engines which all failed
The H.IX V2 was built and SUCCESSFULLY flew with the twin Junkers Jumo 004B engines.
The Horton 229 V3 was just slightly modified from that yet it was working and in flying condition, yet shortly after captured by allies.
and to the ammo racks ....store less ammo ....
i only use like 1/3 of my max ammo cap. and i rarely get racked.
also yes it is possible for a shell to ricochet and penetrate through your tracks as much as its possible for it to hit the commanders hatch and create lethal fragmentation or even ricochet off into the tank.
rare but possible.