Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
You're looking for Star Wars Galaxies then. Unfortunately they shut that down a while back.
Adding the option to land on planets and do whatever it is you want to do would be very demanding and push back a release date well beyond what this developer had in mind.
Not even big budget games have done that since SWG.
Your opinion is valid until you call X shallow. X is a pretty deep game, deep in ways that a lot of sims/space games aren't. There's simply no reason to land on planets in X, lore wise or mechanically. Missing one feature that a lot of these space games are missing does not make it shallow. It's simply missing a feature that you'd like to see. You're using the wrong word here.
X shallow??? You can't possibly have been playing that game for more than mere minutes.