Asenna Steam
kirjaudu sisään
|
kieli
简体中文 (yksinkertaistettu kiina)
繁體中文 (perinteinen kiina)
日本語 (japani)
한국어 (korea)
ไทย (thai)
български (bulgaria)
Čeština (tšekki)
Dansk (tanska)
Deutsch (saksa)
English (englanti)
Español – España (espanja – Espanja)
Español – Latinoamérica (espanja – Lat. Am.)
Ελληνικά (kreikka)
Français (ranska)
Italiano (italia)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonesia)
Magyar (unkari)
Nederlands (hollanti)
Norsk (norja)
Polski (puola)
Português (portugali – Portugali)
Português – Brasil (portugali – Brasilia)
Română (romania)
Русский (venäjä)
Svenska (ruotsi)
Türkçe (turkki)
Tiếng Việt (vietnam)
Українська (ukraina)
Ilmoita käännösongelmasta
That... is the worst definition of Micro managing I ever saw.
Tell me, who was the ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ idiot who told you that?
Oh please enlighten me, great expert! What is micro then?
Or at least tell me what you think it is... just for laughs you know.
"Micro" is a prefix which means "in miniscule or small scale." In the patio of gamers, it is a slang verb that means "To control single or small groups of units individually by hand instead of issuing blanket commands to the entire available asset."
...in order to use them more effectively... Otherwise there would be no reason behind it.
That makes no sense at all. actually that is a characteristic of a micro intensive person rather than a macro.
To be honest, you could have just said that macro is usually what spammers and people that bring their units all together in one assault (and retreat them all at the same time) usually do, not even using their abilities or potencial to the max. Comparing both definitions (which are somewhat poor, both) you should have used this one instead.
No. Wrong. In RTS/RTT games macro is exactly what I said it is. RTTs like CoH do not have a lot of macro-tasks, because the focus is on micro-managing your units in engagements, which involves movement, positioning, the use of abilities and so on.
Furthermore you don not realy build a base (no multiple factories, baracks and the like - not much to manage). All that is left is your overall gameplan that could be described as macromangagement.
In RTS games like Starcraft on the other hand you have a lot of macro-management involved, which means to manage your base (build orders, expanding, etc.) and unit production. All aimed at spending your income at a constant rate (idealy 1:1 - what comes in goes out) and at the right time.
Get your facts straight and don´t try to lecture me...
If you like to go in deeper you can also make a difference between economical micromanagement, tactical micromanagement and the like. Feel free you use Wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micromanagement_%28gameplay%29
"There is sometimes confusion regarding the difference between micromanagement and macromanagement, normally abbreviated as 'micro' and 'macro' respectively. Macro generally refers to managing large quantities of tasks at the same time. For example, building units from various structures throughout the game while also building more structures, scouting, creating new bases, etc. This is different from micro, which is generally controlling small amounts of units and giving them very specific orders."
You know any ♥♥♥♥♥♥ can modify what is written on wikipedia to his liking, thus making it one of the worst places to check for facts and explanations? Of course not.
Speaking to another ♥♥♥♥♥♥ here. this CoH2 forum is getting worse by the day I swear
Get your tinfoil hats!! QUICK! I bet the CIA did alter that article because of its international influence on the online community!...
If there is a guy that actually took the time to write down an article about something as banal as terms used in a gaming community, then there has to be at least some affiliation to the material.
What is written there is completely correct. Not because it is on Wiki, but because it is correct - yes it is as simple as that. I can´t help that you seem to have no idea about the genre whatsoever. I bet you haven´t played any RTS other games, have you?
But then again, I've seen how bad you are at bringing out facts and reasonable explanations on other posts and discussions so I'm sorry but this conversation is over, it was nice while it lasted.
By that virtue, Joikax, what you append to my given definition would have undermined the value of that definition. Micromanagement is not always effecient or effective, that would be supposition or opinion on the part of the author. When writing a definition or explaining a subject, you should always stick strictly to factual, supported data. Don't add any descriptives which are supposition or conjecture.
Honestly guys, I don't understand the fuss. You're both right and you're both wrong. Why not find the happy middle and go play a game together or something? :)
I bet you just had the same fact-filled discussion about how Blizzard should balance 4vs4 for bronze league players in Starcraft 2... Dude you are so laughable... Talking about "facts" knowing nothing.