Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
-Eliphas! You traitor!(c)
NO.. because they already have their Tigers and Elephants that are much better than their russian counterparts AND are easier to get and spam
1. t34/76 is a medium tank, while a t34/85 is heavy tank (maybe but it affects tech.)
2. t34/85 maybe from a t34 design, but a t34/85 uses a bigger chassis than t34/76 and the also the tank turret would also need to be changed in for a turret that can hold a much bigger barrel.
Шта?(wat?)?!
It appears you don't know your facts. The t-35/85 was never considered a heavy tank. It was a medium tank. The t-34/85 does not have a bigger chassis. The only thing that is different between the t-34/76 and the t-34/85 is the turret and, obviously, the gun.
By the way, the Panther was also considered a medium tank during WWII. I don't know what relic classifies these tanks as, but if they consider it a heavy tank, they are far from correct.