are relic stupid ? you cant have perks in a pvp rts game

[GR]

Honestly it's the biggest mistake they are making.
Everyone has to be on a level playing field or there is simply no point, early units with 10-20% damage bonuses and other stuff will be the difference between winning and losing a game.

It's the little things which matter and if you go take a look not all the perks are small stuff.

It's a huge mistake by relic this game wont be taken seriously at all by the competitive rts community simply because of the pre order perks and bonuses as well as the in game ones.

Imagine if you could get 10-20% damage bonus perk on volks in coh 1 ? lol need I explain further why the unlocks don't belong in an rts ?

[pRaX]

are relic stupid ?

2013... peer2peer /thread

[Reign of Pain]

No, really...why can't you play people around the same rank?

[Blitzk]

lol its a joke............. if i have all these "power ups" and play play a team game and they have none its def a bit one sided_seeing as i will know every place to hide on a map to begin with necause of my skill level?

[TehJumpingJawa]

+1.

Artifical progression system to distract people from the fact they're playing a reskin of CoH1.

[Outcast]

Do you complainers not realize that you can play with other players? As in, maybe you suck but you are teamed up with 1 or 2 experienced players who don't need your help and you sit back and gather experience off their armies as they win the match. In the matches I've noticed that they balance out the levels of the players involved. If you have a high level on 1 team, you tend to get one close to that level on the other team. Same for low levels, each side gets about the same overall ranks of players. Having a level 1 ranker in my match while I'm 46 doesn't bother me. I adjust my plans to take into account that they may not know what to do.

[C.heaT Bringin the Tent.]

Skull&Bones you're correct. A lot of people drink the cool aid and just like whatever the delvoper does. The fact is if you have two players with the same skill set. The person that has more time to play the game is now tipped in his favor... That shouldn't happen period. Also the idiot that used conscript vs panther example please stop beathing.

[[Vilu]]

GLRUBBERDUCK eredeti hozzászólása:

in the long run it ♥♥♥♥♥ the game as it makes it impossible for new players to get into it as they get crushed by everyone else who has all the perks.

Why is someone new to the game playing against someone who got everything unlocked? The problem in that scenario is the matchmaking and not the perks itself.

[HectorVivis]

With 3 perks only per match, with so little advantages to the one who unlock them... Ho the ♥♥♥♥ do you want it to really matter ?

And the new player vs veteran is just a joke, the perks won't be the problem, it will be the experience.

I don't particulary like this system, but those sargument... Ho Gosh!

[Henry the Unfamiliar]

This would only be a problem if you weren't limited to three bulletins. As you start with three bulletins, then there's no problem. Sure, a vet may have them more customized to his/her playstyle, but you're going to lose to a vet anyway.

[† Jack † Jesus Saves †]

C.heaT Bringin the Tent. eredeti hozzászólása:

Skull&Bones you're correct. A lot of people drink the cool aid and just like whatever the delvoper does. The fact is if you have two players with the same skill set. The person that has more time to play the game is now tipped in his favor... That shouldn't happen period. Also the idiot that used conscript vs panther example please stop beathing.

You know what started all this crap, MW or COD or whatever, while I was happily playing a clean purist team based PvP FPS in Counterstrike, people were salivating over unlocking this and unlocking that, and now it's everywhere... it's like achievements incentives have made it into the game and now have the ability to effect the actual outcome of the game.... Conceptually I like the idea, but I wish it would be heavily restricted to cosmetic/bragging rights things... likes skins and ranks, snazzier looking tank (or assault rifle in the case of shooters) models

There's no need to be efffecting gameplay like this, EVERYTHING does not have to have RPG elements.

[SirJonC]

......these bulitons dont really do much in the game in the long run because you still need skill wile in cod you dont

[Hannibal Barca]

If you think this is bad you should have played CohO, godmode Volks were awesome sauce

[DaddyJokee]

You get to choose three perks for a battle...Its a very good idea imho because, well, maybe you play a heavy infantry build and you want your infantry to have a bit more HP and a slightly increased accuracy. Whats wrong with that? The enemy can chose to do the very same thing OR they can choose to have mortars do more damage which will nullify any %HP bonus your infantry had...It's fairly well thought out.

[SirJonC]

and maybe if you think ahead and use proper tactics and stratergy (though i too would like all of them unlocked at the start) and play the game instead of whining you will be able to win a few matches again thses bullitins allow you to custamise you army a little bit to you own play stile and doesnt even harm new players becuase of how small of an increase it is and am happy they didnt go over the top with this

[Tsundere Kanojo]

+Crux Terminatus+ eredeti hozzászólása:

If you think this is bad you should have played CohO, godmode Volks were awesome sauce

I still remember how broken CoHO got once you had Pioneers with the same assault rifles as the Knights Cross straight at the start of the game.