Bars vs m1919

[MilfSlayer69]

Which one is worth the most?

[Skullfumble]

both cancer

[ChadSimpKing]

bars for 1v1 2v2 m1919 for 3v3 4v4

[Soffsane™]

It depends on your Munitions float. If you have enough Munitions, the M1919 is better, but is 10 more munitions, which can sometimes not be enough to outfit all the Riflemen.

[DeadOptics]

Bars are better on smaller maps where engagments happen at closer ranges where as m1919 is better at longer ranges. Bars can fire on the move however so depending on you playstyle they maybe better. bars requir teching which is a turn off if you rushing a vehicle.

[Cure Seraph]

BARs are better, but they cost you to unlock, I don't really like LMGs outside of Paratroopers/Pathfinders when they can steal one.

[Crystal meth enthusiast]

They are same.
Only difference is range.
Bars for Mid/close and can fire on move.
M1919 for long range and must be stationary to fire.

[CatMeowMeow]

DPS goes to M1919A6 but BARs still have relatively high damage output and beats M1919A6 at medium and short range.
BARs also have more utilty as it can be fired on the move on all units (even enemies)
But another downside is they have only 20 rounds in a magazine and reloads frequently.

Paratroopers M1919A6 are unique since they can fire any LMG on the move and have different stats when picked up or upgraded.

[Midare-Saki]

i thought it was more of if you dont use combined ops

[MilfSlayer69]

Originally posted by CatMeowMeow:

DPS goes to M1919A6 but BARs still have relatively high damage output and beats M1919A6 at medium and short range.
BARs also have more utilty as it can be fired on the move on all units (even enemies)
But another downside is they have only 20 rounds in a magazine and reloads frequently.

Paratroopers M1919A6 are unique since they can fire any LMG on the move and have different stats when picked up or upgraded.

wow paras can fire lmg on the move
i never noticed that .....

[MilfSlayer69]

Another question if I may, Paras or Rangers? same thing ? Rangers to close combat, and paras to fight long range? If I put 3 bars on the rangers is it worth it?

[Crystal meth enthusiast]

Originally posted by kamicrazy:

Another question if I may, Paras or Rangers? same thing ? Rangers to close combat, and paras to fight long range? If I put 3 bars on the rangers is it worth it?

That's very interesting question.

Definately not same thing. I noticed more damage from paras, because 6 men, but at same time Rangers have -10% resistance to all damage. And with vet bonuses it become noticeble difference in durability.
Paras with SMGs take heavy casualties, that's why people choose LMGs more often.

Paras can fire LMG on move, but what's point? They have 25% of normal accuracy. Obers much more.

I tried 3 bars multiple times, but didn't achived big DPS difference. 4 SMG + BAR looks better.


You don't have to choose Paras or Rangers. Usually it's like "P-47 vs Pershing" options. Where Elte infantry just bonus.

[MilfSlayer69]

Originally posted by Pink Omega:

Originally posted by kamicrazy:

Another question if I may, Paras or Rangers? same thing ? Rangers to close combat, and paras to fight long range? If I put 3 bars on the rangers is it worth it?

That's very interesting question.

Definately not same thing. I noticed more damage from paras, because 6 men, but at same time Rangers have -10% resistance to all damage. And with vet bonuses it become noticeble difference in durability.
Paras with SMGs take heavy casualties, that's why people choose LMGs more often.

Paras can fire LMG on move, but what's point? They have 25% of normal accuracy. Obers much more.

I tried 3 bars multiple times, but didn't achived big DPS difference. 4 SMG + BAR looks better.


You don't have to choose Paras or Rangers. Usually it's like "P-47 vs Pershing" options. Where Elte infantry just bonus.

thanks pink