Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Either Mayans or Incas for the Best Civ.
Incas as the Best Civ For the Forgotten Expansion
Ethiopians for the Best African Kingdoms Civ.
Mayan Archer Flush is Deadly. Incan Trush is Deadly and their unique units are the best in the game. The Ethiopians are deadly no matter what you do with them. The Archer Flush is just as good as the mayan one, Knight Rushes are hard to do against them because they get free pikeman upgrade and their economy is solid. In the late game they have the best onagers in the game and their shotel warriors are so fast to build that you can make a serious comeback in no time.
you think ethiopians are the best of the new ones, then you must be fine with picking them against malians. Also mayans are from conqueros not forgotten.
Inca's also have the most broken castle age unit in the game, the slinger. Its just too obscenely powerful in castle. I think its fine lategame but castle slinger needs a nerf and an elite upgrade to be relevant the entire game.
Ethiopians have lots of great 1v1 bonuses. They should be able to do well in almost any situation. I think they have a good lategame due to torsion engines. Their siege is really strong.
Berbers, like the incas, have an overly dominant castle age. 20% cheaper knights is far too strong.
Just as an explanation, in the conquerors you had the top 3 which were Aztec/Huns/Mayans (all new civs, all made to be much stronger than the rest)
Of them, Huns is the strongest in feudal, but late game Mayans wins vs both. Because maps usually have an "average" level of walling, the mayan wall bonus comes in handy which allows them to force a late game between the players; which favours mayans.
Goths could counter huns/mayan effectively if they weren't so underpowered by comparison.
So could you find a #1 overall best pick for 1v1 arabia in AoFE/AoAK? Probably, it's just hard because not many pros play AoAK and so you never see civs maxed to their potential.
Just looking at the AoAK civs, Eths/Malians seems to jump out as having the best potential for 1v1 arabia; at least from what I've read. Berbers look pretty strong too when they get to castle age. I'd need to see the exact unit stats in order to make a more specific estimate.
At the moment I am working on a handbook which shows that everything, but it will take a while till it'll be a guide on steam
I know you said everything, but you must have an outline of sorts :P
Which units are best against each units. Strategies and tactics like fast castle, rushing (which I am not fan of, but it shall be a complete guide) and so on and so on
hd has the way better balance than aoc, nerfed mayans, nerfed huns, nerfed eagle spam.
and stuff that got introduced new can´t of course be balanced right away but it will be with the next patches.