安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Wait... after re-reading your post, I may have missed your point...
Are you saying that the reason the game functions so poorly on my end is NOT due to my internet connection or my weak netbook, but rather the crappy engine of AoE2 HD?
The engine is the reason the game bogs at relatively low population numbers?
The engine is the reason my villagers move slow as heck and Im struggling to advance as fast as the people Im competing against?
Am I to assume that everyone Im playing against online has this patch installed from Voobly and then they come back to Steam to play online?
If that is the case, I'll download the patch right now.
But it would not explain how my little brother, a total NOOB at this game has a massive army twice as fast as I do and I struggle to keep up despite my years of experience playing this game. Im playing with a computer that has the BARE MINIMUM requirements to run this software. Here are my current specs:
NextBook Flexx 10
• Intel® Atom Quad-Core / 1.8GHz (Z3735F)
• 2GB DDR3L; 32GB onboard storage
Even playing my original engined (cracked) AoE2 I run into bogging problems over 100 population.
I can look a bit for 13 inch gaming laptops but they seem to be a rarity. Ordering a chassis from clevo would require you to assemble it which I am assuming you would not be comfortable doing.
Edit: The 15-s is immensely superior to your netbook. I will try to list comparative specs. These might be incorrect for the flex 10 as they are harder to find.
Flexx 10
HARD DRIVE---32 gb hard drive (Or 64gb for larger model. I think you have this.)
CPU----"quad core" (?)intel atom @ 1.83 ghz (I believe this is a dual core multithreaded.)
RAM---2gb of ram (ddr3 probably.)
RES---1280x800 (or 1366x768 for the larger model. Again you probably have this.)
GPU--None/intigrated graphics.
eon 15-s
SSD--256 gb ssd. (This would store the operating system and have extra for applications.)
HARD DRIVE--1 tb hard drive (For normal files.)
CPU--intel i7-6700hq quad-core @ 2.60 ghz. (This is a true quad core multithreaded to 8.)
RAM--16 gb of ddr4 @2133mhz. (Immensly faster and larger compared to your current ram.)
RES---1920x1080 (Or 3840 x 2160) IPS display.
GPU--NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M 6GB GDDR @ 924 mhz
To be completely honest I believe an eon 15-s would be overkill for your needs. It would definitely be powerful enough for age of empires and games years to come. Its gpu is stronger than my current laptop. I mostly play at 2560x1440 on a 30 inch monitor so the 15-s would be more than capable of playing at 1920x1080. (Or even higher resolutions.)
This would be portable but they also have 13 and 14 inch gaming laptops. I will look a bit at other ones that might be good and less overkill. I think a non "gaming" laptop would work better as gaming laptops generally have top of the line hardware. Not sure you would need a super pc.
Edit: Found the 13-s on origin pc asia. No idea why it is not on the u.s. site. Not sure if you could order it though.
https://originpc.asia/sg/System/EON13-S-PRO
Your pc specs are very weak and definitely play a part in poor performance. Hd's engine also plays a part in poor performance but you would definitely benefit from getting a new pc. If the devs did improve the engine your current netbook would play it a little better but it would still run horribly.
In the mean time lowering the resolution in windows might help the game run slightly less terrible.
Edit: I do not think any computer in the world can comfortably play the game at 300+ population. The game's engine simply needs to be improved. You could spend probably $10000+ usd and still be unable to play smoothly at 500 pop. If the devs ever utilise multiple cores we could probably play 500 pop ludikris fine with a decent pc.
So if the engine is that bad, how is everyone playing this game with huge populations? I literally just lost to a guy that felt like he had a army of 300+.
Does the Voobly patch work on Steam?
Yeah, the 15-S is probably overkill. But it's indeed what I asked you to find me.
If you come across a laptop that better suits my needs, Im all ears.
I'll give that Orgin 13" a look.
Thank u so much for your help.
I recommend you give it a try it if aoe2 HD doesn't run smooth on your old laptop. The original game was made to run on cheap office PCs back in 1999, aoe2 HD is built on a new engine only modern mid-high end PCs run well
You cannot play on Steam with the original game, but you have to use a 3rd party client called Voobly to play it. It's very easy to set up.
I definitely wouldn't get a high end PC just to be able to run this game.
Edit: any potato that has a dedicated gpu will work. "As well as it can" means that it reaches the limit where the crap engine and netcode themselves begin to be the bottleneck. Also as a general rule, 200+ pop games are not recommended in any case, on HD.
i play at 900p, so 1080p could be a bit worse
Point is that I consider any GPU usage such an overkill measure that it far supersedes the needed graphics needs as compared to the limits that the engine's crappiness provides.
My work laptop has 2 GPUs and runs for about $1200 USD. Lenovo W550. (Since replaced by P50s.) It's 15.6". I've had good luck with their X series (12.5") and the T460s (14") also performs very well.
What are the "optional improvements"?