Steam telepítése
belépés
|
nyelv
简体中文 (egyszerűsített kínai)
繁體中文 (hagyományos kínai)
日本語 (japán)
한국어 (koreai)
ไทย (thai)
Български (bolgár)
Čeština (cseh)
Dansk (dán)
Deutsch (német)
English (angol)
Español - España (spanyolországi spanyol)
Español - Latinoamérica (latin-amerikai spanyol)
Ελληνικά (görög)
Français (francia)
Italiano (olasz)
Bahasa Indonesia (indonéz)
Nederlands (holland)
Norsk (norvég)
Polski (lengyel)
Português (portugáliai portugál)
Português - Brasil (brazíliai portugál)
Română (román)
Русский (orosz)
Suomi (finn)
Svenska (svéd)
Türkçe (török)
Tiếng Việt (vietnámi)
Українська (ukrán)
Fordítási probléma jelentése
genovese crosbows vs all mounted units,
20% cheaper handcanons to wreck infantry,
20% cheaper bombard canons to deal from a safe distance with onagers&trebs
condotieros to handle gunpowder along with aztek&mayan eagles/goth huskarl quick flood styles
full hussar&cavalier for dealing with archers/siege/what ever other utility role u need filled
Oh btw theyr age ups are 15% cheaper and this usually translates into being able to at the very least keep up in tech with yr oponent(ideally surpass him by quite a bit)... also theyr tech tree is rather well rounded
I think its cool you are thinking outside of the box and are having fun with it, so by no means I want to take that away from you. However, in my experience your approach is only viable on low skill games or vs AI. Playing overly defensively is very risky as you give away too much map control and your opponent will boom undisturbed. It seems you play some form of Fast Castle into Castle Drop strategy, which at best is achievable at usually around 16 minutes. On open maps vs equaly skilled opponents thats pure suicide unless you are a master of early super efficient walling. Don't get me wrong, I would really like your approach to be as viable as the standard offensive approach, I just have my doubts. Feel free to convince me though, if you have a good replay or some other idea.
Incas, Saracens, Byzantines, Malians, Chinese come into my mind. If you 1vs1 or be close to an enemy, it is extremely hard to boom and if you are a pocket player, it doesn't really matter how good your defenses are if you just can boom hard enough. So in cases where it is revelant (having an opponent next to you) you should have a balance of defense techs and early game bonuses, aka. Incas, Chinese or Malians (before the patch).
Don't forget, however, the Spanish, because in team games their gold bonus is amazing; however, in 1 v 1 they have the fastest builders for that unexpected defensive building, and are the only civ with fully upgradable trash.
Cheers,
in short, get good with mayans, then switch to chineese.
tldr: The map choice for your strat matters much more than your civ choice.