Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Because
Britons are weaker than Celts in the late game, so trying to close up the game before it comes to it is the thing to do as Britons.
There are many expert Britons vs Celts matchups on YouTube so you might to like to check them out too:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=britons+vs+celts
Skill level matters way more than civs. You simply got outplayed by a better player it seems.
Its a different story if he can make siege thought, if he can afford siege and mass Woads the game is probably already over at that point.
Isnt't it just late game if everybody can afford everything? Then you reach the point where all the resources are used and you have to buy stone and gold in the market. And then you can't afford anything again.
Hand cannoneers are a solution against woad raiders. But sadly about 50% of the civs don't have hand cannoneers. It's just sad that some civs are weak against other civs.
Also a combination of plumed archers and onagers is too strong. The onagers kill skirmishers immediately and the plumed archers kill everything else with one shot.