安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
举报此帖
Play the game for more than an hour and you would know.
SK S9... It even says it in the name...
Your here talking about the in game guns and you don't even
know what guns are in the game....
When people hear "clone", they imagine something similar to the item being referenced that is an entirely different item. For example, calling the AUR AX an "AUR A1 clone" fits this idea since they are identical in every way except for the AX having a rail mount instead of an attached scope. The same can be said of the CR-550 and the M70 since these are effectively clones of each other with minor differences
When you call something a clone just because it had its name changed, it's not going to make sense to most people
if you "knew" every gun in the game then you would have known
what i was talking about Jethro and Idaho, who actually Do know the
game had no problem identifying the weapon in question.
Clearly, if there is a 50% understanding rate, then it's not an effective means of saying it since 2 people understood it and 2 people were confused. If all you said was SKS and left out the "clone" part, nobody would have been confused whatsoever because everyone here knew what the SKS is, but not everyone knew what the "SKS clone" was
I guess some people can't admit they made a mistake.
Nuff' said about this, have a good day.
I don't get this animosity, if there are weapons that are similar it just adds to immersion and realism. Vanilla is luckily still a survival game, I always welcome "clutter weapons" that make the real deal harder to find.
This said the examples you give are not exactly in the tomato-tomahto range, I would always pick up a Winchester over a CR550, for the simple reason that I like to see where my shots land, and I can't honestly be arsed to look for the magazines. Same reason people here still like the Mosin over the SV98.
The two AUGs can't be more different, one is the carbine version, that can't mount optics, has one of the worse sights in the game and only fires from the dedicated magazine, the AX version is the real deal, full barrel, better damage, optics and scopes option, proper suppressor and able to load any magazine you can find.
The CR-550 and M70 are effectively reskins of the same weapon. They are both hunting rifles, both take the same attachments, both fire the same caliber, both are nearly identical in weight, both take up the same amount of slots in a backpack, and both spawn in the same locations with the ONLY difference between them being that the CR-550 requires a magazine while the M70 has an integrated magazine
While you could argue that the magazine condition sets it apart enough to be different from the M70, that's really not enough to justify it as a "clutter" weapon. Additionally, since the CR-550 is a bolt-action rifle, manually having to reload after each shot isn't as much of a downside as an M4 with a mag compared to an M4 without a mag would be, so the magazine requirement barely puts it below the M70 in terms of overall usability
Ultimately, the one downside of the CR-550 vs the M70 isn't enough of a downside to justify two different weapons. If you have a CR-550 without a magazine, the only thing you're having to deal with is a 1-2 second longer reload time between shots while everything else would be the same
You can fire one shot, if you are in no rush top load it and keep doing that until you need to fire all 5 shots in a faster time. Its one of the reasons why I maintain the SKS is actually one of the best guns in the game just due to its ease to find, set up, its flexibility in combat.
Why would you take the SV98 over an M70? Or over a CR550? I'm not saying that we need to feature creep and make every new gun the best but .338 is IMO a reasonable round to stop at as the top tier. And if you wont do that then please add a 12-16x scope that can go on guns with rails.
When you're sniping, you're typically not going to be shooting a lot and, if you are, you're just not sniping very well. When it comes to close encounters, you're either going to be relying on a appropriate secondary weapon or putting yourself at a major disadvantage with the bolt-action in close quarters
Realistically, I don't see them making a new ammo type nor adding in a high-power scope like that. As you can see, most people are already not too big of fans of snipers in general since it doesn't promote very engaging gameplay experiences. Personally, I have no issue with it because people are gonna play how they want whether they have a sniper rifle or a shotgun, so limiting the choices doesn't make sense
However, there are obviously some sensible limitations regarding weaponry to keep it feeling more like a hardcore survival and less like a mil sim game. For example, there's really no place for rocket launchers or tanks in this game, so they're not ever gonna be added into the vanilla game. I'd say that .338 Lapua is pretty much the top line for high-tier equipment being added to this game since anything else would be pushing it such as .50 cal weaponry
An M4 takes the same slots as an AUG, fires the same round, mounts the same optics and magazines, but even without considering the looks, which apparently makes it fine compared to M70-CR550, they can't be more different looking at the stats.
The magazine thing for the CR 550 influences the approach you need to have when trying to put together a high end sniper rifle, and yes, chambering every round may not seem a big deal, but that 1-2 seconds extra can make the difference between you being able to follow up a shot on someone you knocked out because he's wearing armour, and that same guy getting back up and into cover.
And once again, they are very different weapons if you look at the stats. Recoil is the red flag for me, CR550 is even worse than a Blaze, and miles behind the Winchester.
I get your point, they may look identical, but if the difference in stats influences my gameplay and approach to the weapon, that's good enough for me.