Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Low recoil, very accurate and strong..
Lar to me is great for everything but i pefer to have m4 allways with me + let say mosin or svd.
Lar is just to hard to find so it hearts when you loose it.
As for Assault Rifles, AK74 has the lowest recoil (same round weight as the 5.56mm NATO but with less initial velocity) so I would take that over any M4 or AKM.
If you want a sniper rifle the choice is between the Winchester and the Blaze, because they can mount the most powerful scope. They both have pros and cons, Blaze can fire two quick shots but has a massive recoil compared to the Winnie, which fires five rounds that need to be chambered. In short, for long range safe shots the Winnie si better, Blaze can come in handy also on medium ranges, but has problems with the follow up at long distance.
All in all, keeping in mind that all intermediate (5.45, 5.56 and 7.62 AK) and full power cartridges (.308 and 7.62mmR) deal the same amount of damage, it's not hard to narrow down to the best weapon in all the categories.
They may have marginally different ballistics, but they have the same damage and penetration values.
Svd and mosin especially svd is much powerful on long distance then lar..
The ballistics might be better, but a 800m shot is sure easier to score with a 8x Long Range Scope, rather than the 4x of the PSO-1 or the 3.5x of the PU.
Because of scope limitations the SVD is still a remarkable weapon, but shots above 400-500m start to be problematic. Same for the FAL, which mounts a 4x ACOG, but at those ranges I rather have the FAL, which I can turn into an effective AR if needs come. The SVD on the other hand is too "specialized", it's a decent medium range sniper rifle, but in other situations is just an overpowered SKS.
Twas 3.5 last time I'vcheck.
When you use lar and svd above 300m use use semi auto on both weapons.
And both are to lond for breaching.. al do lar have auto option..
Thats way it is better for me to use svd or mosin and m4..with 60 rounds instead of lar 20
Just like the FAL, but a primary-secondary loadout is easier to pull with the FAL, stick it with a Blaze or a Winchester and you will be ready for everything.
With an SVD you need a sniper rifle and a short range automatic.
I would love to see these differences implemented in the game, but as far as I know, bullet damage and penetration are copy pasted for all ammo in the same category. Only pistol cartridges and the 9x39mm are different.
I never measured them, but an M4 or AK with a suppressor on doesn't feel much smaller than a FAL... The SVD on the other hand is a spear.
Better to have 2 guns specialized for different purpose..
When you loose lar you will not be happy cos it is very hard to get one.
Svd, Mosin or m4 are easy to get.