What problems does Livonia have?

[Alaskin]

Why on Livonia is low online?

[ast]

it's paid DLC and a recycled map from ArmA3, not everyone bought it.

apart from that survival is a bit harsher there and some players might find the map boring because it has no real highlights to offer.

[Longhaul]

I don't have any interest in that map really. Find Deer Isle way more interesting.

[秋]

map is boring and generic. there are no points of interests really.
it has been marketed and sold as a forest map with hunting, in reality the largest part of the map is just plain boring fields.
right in the middle is a river with some villages around it, and that is it.
you want a good experience? try vanilla namalsk.

[us271934-Слава Україн]

It's generally harder to survive so people find easier servers.

[秋]

Originally posted by us271934:

It's generally harder to survive so people find easier servers.

where? on livonia? havent noticed that.

[baddoggs]

If you have no imagination, it could be boring...
If you have imagination, it is quite good fun. You need real skill
for PvP as there is nowhere near the cover you get on the default map.
I reckon half the players that said "boring" really meant too hard and i
need my hand held....

More wolves, more bears, harsher weather, flat open terrain...
AND the zees swarm, especially at night.

[2High2tell]

I like the map and play on a hardcore survival server. I like it. I do not think it was worth the money. As I think it should have been a free DLC . Mod created maps like Dear Island and now Namaslk are free and much better.

I did get it on sale, and feel justified now as I play it everyday. There is a lot of military places and bigger cities south So I am not to sure what others are talking about there. Hunting is good as there seems to be more animals then Cherno map. The server has very low loot so if your not hunting your dying. All and all it is decent but overpriced.

[\m/]

For survivial a near perfect map, no one needs big mil areas everywhere, overall it fits the survival aspect more than cherno.
Wintermaps are also not everyones taste.. (i dislike them cuz bright snow everywhere - nothing for long sessions with my old eyes)

[Arsaces]

Livonia is nice as it forces you to hunt or you will die. The servers are also dead so base building is better as you are less likely to be raided. I have ran into two massive bases on one Livonia Server. It is a refreshing map after playing Chernarus since Arma 2 even if Livonia is a Arma 3 map.

[Ted]

I don't enjoy it personally. The map looks nice than Chernarus but it has a massive dead zone at the bottom. I have no issues with surviving on it, I just don't enjoy it.

[ast]

Originally posted by Munter_Mat:

I don't enjoy it personally. The map looks nice than Chernarus but it has a massive dead zone at the bottom. I have no issues with surviving on it, I just don't enjoy it.

agreed to the dead zone, they should've just put one rewarding POI in the south, like castle ruins, mil base, cave system...whatever...to give the player a reason to go there.

otherwise I think it's the most realistic map, basically just one extended hunting ground.

[\m/]

there are tier4 zones :-)

[Ted]

Originally posted by ast:

Originally posted by Munter_Mat:

I don't enjoy it personally. The map looks nice than Chernarus but it has a massive dead zone at the bottom. I have no issues with surviving on it, I just don't enjoy it.

agreed to the dead zone, they should've just put one rewarding POI in the south, like castle ruins, mil base, cave system...whatever...to give the player a reason to go there.

otherwise I think it's the most realistic map, just one extended hunting ground.

That is fair too.

I get why many disagree with me but I still love Chernarus as there is just something I love about spawning on a coast with nothing. It just 'feels' better to me if that makes sense...

[ast]

Originally posted by Munter_Mat:

Originally posted by ast:

agreed to the dead zone, they should've just put one rewarding POI in the south, like castle ruins, mil base, cave system...whatever...to give the player a reason to go there.

otherwise I think it's the most realistic map, just one extended hunting ground.

That is fair too.

I get why many disagree with me but I still love Chernarus as there is just something I love about spawning on a coast with nothing. It just 'feels' better to me if that makes sense...

maybe it feels better because you've got everything in front of you and nothing in your back ;)

in Livonia you kinda always feel exposed

[Ted]

Originally posted by ast:

maybe it feels better because you've got everything in front of you and nothing in your back ;)

in Livonia you kinda always feel exposed

Lol...but nah not really. Its the feel of the map I prefer, Livonia feels like half a map to me as the bottom half is pointless. I prefer Deer Isle for an alternative to Chernarus but I will always prefer Chernarus