6
已評論
產品
158
帳戶內
產品

gerber baby grow up plan 最近的評論

目前顯示第 1-6 項,共 6 項
36 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
1 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 6.6 小時
PROS:
  • lovely character design
  • quaint art style/aesthetic
  • outstanding soundtrack
  • charming settings to explore, interesting world-building
  • preachy yet important? morals (the very real circumstance occurring today--coal-mining and farming towns vaporizing at a rapid pace due to consolidation, green energy, youth moving to more populated suburbs and cities, etc., as well as the typical teenage existentialism)

CONS:
  • the main character is almost insufferable at times. the epitome of spoiled, immature, and reckless. she's mentally 12. i related to bea and angus, not so much to gregg, and i ended up actively disliking mae. this was probably on purpose, i realize, but is still grating
  • yes, i know, a whole motif in this game is "is choice but an illusion??" but honestly i felt it was genuinely lacking a bit in the freedom/choice-making department. i can accept that the dialogue choices being redundant was on purpose, but that doesn't make me think it was a fun or good thing to do
  • some of the plot ideas felt very loosely-strung together or thrown in at the last minute. very little explanation for things except "mae is just very mentally ill"
  • the band you're in feels kind of pointless. what are they practicing for?
  • the dream sequences were slow and eye-glazingly dull. as noted earlier, though, the orchestral arrangements were top-notch
  • a good lot of the dialogue was unrealistic (20-year-olds saying "effing" and "yuppers"?) and at times just fluffy, blabbering filler that i found myself skipping past. no i didnt skip past all of the dialogue, but how many times are gregg and mae going to go "crimes?" "crimes." to each other? as a result, the characters felt a bit flat to me
  • MANY loose ends that are not tied up at the conclusion of the game (maybe easy tie-ups for a sequel? still kind of irritating)
  • very short amount of playtime for twenty dollars, honestly. it took me under 7 hours to beat the entire game, and i explored minor character branches like germ, lori, and selmers in addition to the main friend group activities. for twenty dollars that isn't a very good playtime:cost ratio. that's my biggest sin with this game, in all honestly. for five, or even ten dollars, i'd recommend it. i cannot, in good faith, recommend paying full price for it.

tl;dr i did like the game in the sense that i liked the world and the characters in it, but the actual driving of the plot and the dialogue fell short in a lot of areas in which i wanted it to really shine. i guess that's why i wrote this review. this game could've been so much more. buy it at a discount.
張貼於 2017 年 4 月 22 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
3 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
4 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 8.7 小時 (評論時已進行 3.9 小時)
shmity more like ♥♥♥♥♥ because his jokes are ♥♥♥♥!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
張貼於 2016 年 1 月 6 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
2 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
3 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 304.0 小時 (評論時已進行 66.4 小時)
this is a nice game but trevor is too dirty AND! i cannot walk inside the cluckin. bell s .o that's a 0/1000 from me rocksTARD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
張貼於 2015 年 4 月 27 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
2 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
4 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 12.5 小時 (評論時已進行 9.5 小時)
this game caused me to divorce my husband because he cheated on me with lina i've had about enough of that b!tch
張貼於 2015 年 3 月 18 日。 最後編輯於 2015 年 3 月 19 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
2 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
1 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 4,758.8 小時 (評論時已進行 1,725.1 小時)
ears
張貼於 2012 年 11 月 4 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
1 個人認為這篇評論值得參考
1 個人認為這篇評論很有趣
總時數 91.5 小時
i remember
stalin days
full of bear and
kalashnikov
張貼於 2012 年 11 月 4 日。
這篇評論值得參考嗎? 搞笑 獎勵
目前顯示第 1-6 項,共 6 項