Team Fortress 2
Benji (Заблокований) 22 лип. 2014 о 16:18
Vintage Stockbroker's Scarf and Foster's Facade
Just curious, why are the vintage versions of the S.S. and F.F. worth less than the unique versions?
< >
Показані коментарі 115 із 16
Because there are more vintages than there are uniques methinks.
Цитата допису Baseball Bibbins:
Because there are more vintages than there are uniques methinks.
Pretty much this. Which is why a S.Vinatge Stock brokers scarf is worth way less then a normal strange one.
Oh well.
Автор останньої редакції: Amelia; 22 лип. 2014 о 16:31
Vintage versions are easier to come by: The vintage version was given to anyone who owned Killing Floor before the promotion, and the unique versions where given to those who bought it after.

There are more vintage ones in the game than there are unique.
They're kind of bad hats why would you want them
Цитата допису Nor // Taiga:
They're kind of bad hats why would you want them
I like the mask personally, not really a fan of the tie though.
I love the tie. It's the only cosmetic I wear on Pyro, because it doesn't look stupid, flashy or just childish.
Цитата допису no, i am not an alt:
I love the tie. It's the only cosmetic I wear on Pyro, because it doesn't look stupid, flashy or just childish.
Too bad the Soot Suit is basically just a better version of the tie.
Цитата допису Jingle Pyro:
Цитата допису no, i am not an alt:
I love the tie. It's the only cosmetic I wear on Pyro, because it doesn't look stupid, flashy or just childish.
Too bad the Soot Suit is basically just a better version of the tie.
It looks stupid. Stockbrocker's Scarf doesn't have the stupid undershirt.
Цитата допису no, i am not an alt:
Цитата допису Jingle Pyro:
Too bad the Soot Suit is basically just a better version of the tie.
It looks stupid. Stockbrocker's Scarf doesn't have the stupid undershirt.
How is the undershirt stupid, exactly? The undershirt exemplifies the tie, and overall the design is aesthetically pleasing.

On the flipside, you have the stockbrokers scarf: basically the same item without an undershirt and incredibly glitchy during humiliation or when frightened. It's not terrible, but it's rather underwhelming and less visually appealing.
Цитата допису Jingle Pyro:
Цитата допису no, i am not an alt:
It looks stupid. Stockbrocker's Scarf doesn't have the stupid undershirt.
How is the undershirt stupid, exactly? The undershirt exemplifies the tie, and overall the design is aesthetically pleasing.

On the flipside, you have the stockbrokers scarf: basically the same item without an undershirt and incredibly glitchy during humiliation or when frightened. It's not terrible, but it's rather underwhelming and less visually appealing.
But the undershirt is extremely flashy. Stockbrocker is just straight to the point: a tie. No nothing.
Автор останньої редакції: ADD THIS PLS; 22 лип. 2014 о 17:52
Цитата допису no, i am not an alt:
Цитата допису Jingle Pyro:
How is the undershirt stupid, exactly? The undershirt exemplifies the tie, and overall the design is aesthetically pleasing.

On the flipside, you have the stockbrokers scarf: basically the same item without an undershirt and incredibly glitchy during humiliation or when frightened. It's not terrible, but it's rather underwhelming and less visually appealing.
But the undershit is extremely flashy. Stockbrocker is just straight to the point: a tie. No nothing.
Extremely flashy? It's an undershirt dude. It's not some blinding lime green flapjack or something, it's a minor detail that exemplifies the tie. Hell, it's not like it's straight up white either - It's a subtle creamy white, as you'd expect from an undershirt.
Can't be used to craft other hats.
Цитата допису no, i am not an alt:
Well, each man to his own.
No matter what variation on it, we can agree ties are pretty awesome.
Цитата допису Jingle Pyro:
Цитата допису no, i am not an alt:
Well, each man to his own.
No matter what variation on it, we can agree ties are pretty awesome.
That we can.
< >
Показані коментарі 115 із 16
На сторінку: 1530 50

Опубліковано: 22 лип. 2014 о 16:18
Дописів: 16