Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Instead, the Total War games occur in an historical setting with numerous events and characters which resemble events which occured or people who lived in history.
I never asked about a " completely historically accurate " I asked if it is just historical accurate, and of course as far as it is possible for a game.
Thank you for your answer.
And the difference there is....?
And yet he asked for "Y or N ?". That's pretty absolute.
Correct, thank you for your answer and support.
Yeah, it's a shame history (and real life in pretty much every regard) is not this black and white.
To even ask the question is to demonstrate an almost complete lack of understanding of history which is way more nuanced than the binary question asked by the OP.
DIE ODA SCUM!!!
My question was more refering to part like units,architecture,landscapes,language,factions, and as you said names of course.
I am aware that it would not be 'historical correct' in terms like moving my troops somewhere, strategy and AI acting. Or at least, only very basical historical correct.
Thanks for your answer.
Well, they speak Japanese in the game, but is it spoken by real Japanese? And is the slang medieval ?
If you actually care about real clans, provinces, officers and historical missions/events, try Nobunaga's Ambition 14.