安裝 Steam
登入
|
語言
簡體中文
日本語(日文)
한국어(韓文)
ไทย(泰文)
Български(保加利亞文)
Čeština(捷克文)
Dansk(丹麥文)
Deutsch(德文)
English(英文)
Español - España(西班牙文 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙文 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希臘文)
Français(法文)
Italiano(義大利文)
Bahasa Indonesia(印尼語)
Magyar(匈牙利文)
Nederlands(荷蘭文)
Norsk(挪威文)
Polski(波蘭文)
Português(葡萄牙文 - 葡萄牙)
Português - Brasil(葡萄牙文 - 巴西)
Română(羅馬尼亞文)
Русский(俄文)
Suomi(芬蘭文)
Svenska(瑞典文)
Türkçe(土耳其文)
tiếng Việt(越南文)
Українська(烏克蘭文)
回報翻譯問題
Instead, the Total War games occur in an historical setting with numerous events and characters which resemble events which occured or people who lived in history.
I never asked about a " completely historically accurate " I asked if it is just historical accurate, and of course as far as it is possible for a game.
Thank you for your answer.
And the difference there is....?
And yet he asked for "Y or N ?". That's pretty absolute.
Correct, thank you for your answer and support.
Yeah, it's a shame history (and real life in pretty much every regard) is not this black and white.
To even ask the question is to demonstrate an almost complete lack of understanding of history which is way more nuanced than the binary question asked by the OP.
DIE ODA SCUM!!!
My question was more refering to part like units,architecture,landscapes,language,factions, and as you said names of course.
I am aware that it would not be 'historical correct' in terms like moving my troops somewhere, strategy and AI acting. Or at least, only very basical historical correct.
Thanks for your answer.
Well, they speak Japanese in the game, but is it spoken by real Japanese? And is the slang medieval ?
If you actually care about real clans, provinces, officers and historical missions/events, try Nobunaga's Ambition 14.