Preview 1[photos.app.goo.gl]
Can you explain the effects -if they are exist-?
Preview 2[photos.app.goo.gl]
I know the effects. Considering it done, exept that the second option should not like that, I belive.
Preview 3[photos.app.goo.gl]
Reynett always be replaced with Bussche no matter I choose. Even worse if I choose the second, because it decreases the base stability. Is it as was supposed?

1. A teaser for the future updates on ahistorical paths. 2nd option currently only has Furstner transferred to the Indies as a naval theorist but if you looked up his history you'll know about what i have in store for him.

2. A slip-up when i initially making the Council VP event chain, i originally intended to make GG Bonifacius de Jonge either appoint Bussche (a), Jonkman (b), or just wait (c) until Tjarda van Starkenborgh was here and replacing De Jonge, before realizing that in no way he would appoint someone in Van Mook's circle. Also Tjarda would be a bit preoccupied for his first few months here. Jan Jonkman would be a VP candidate in the 1938 event chain only if he was appointed to the Council.

3. Yes. The 2nd option's "narrative" is that Meyer Ranneft just wanted to go home after dealing with De Jonge's stubborness for the past 5 years but Tjarda insists for him to stay here and aid him to implement Ranneft's ideas on reforming the administration (become a Silent Workhorse). Stability loss is minor anyway and in the upcoming update i'll replace it with moderate PP loss.

I currently torn in half to decide whether the event chains to be more narrative-driven (like Turkey path, TNO. or Kaiserreich) or game mechanic-driven (like the vanilla game except Turkey or RT56) lol. Guess the mix of two like this would be enough for now.

Okay. Good thank. And can I request that Advisors can be fired if we gain our Independence? They are sucks.

Yup, agreed with your suggestion.

Council VPs would not be relevant anymore when East Indies becomes supervised state with the "Challenge Elitism" route.

But on the "Affirm Our Loyalties" path it would be not until we're at peace and independent.

Originally posted by Krasna Merah:

Yup, agreed with your suggestion.

Council VPs would not be relevant anymore when East Indies becomes supervised state with the "Challenge Elitism" route.

But on the "Affirm Our Loyalties" path it would be not until we're at peace and independent.

Manghxtap. This what I need right now.

Preview 4[photos.app.goo.gl]
I think it should be switched. Cracking the demonstrants means a support for Japan.

Another bug (I'm not sure it's a bug or not), when I complete the flexible navy or dominant navy, the research bonus doesn't apply to MtG's Techs (Ship Hull Researches, because the ship researches are disabled if the DLC is active). And this is a big pain in the A$$.
I absolutely don't know anything about modding. But I think the effect should say like:

Reduce ahead of time penalty by y years and give a m% research bonus. Valid for next n researches of these technologies: sss models

Intead of mentioning various ship names.

I will patiently wait for your next update, don't rush yoursalf. Good job and have a good rest.

Stability-war support debuffs are on the right place but everything else below it are switched up.

Noted.

About the naval tech bug, it's a leftover from pre-Avalanche era when both naval hulls and naval support tech were on the same tab. Already fixing it by comparing the existing naval-related bonus from other focus trees.

In my strong opinion, INS_nusantara_accord is absolutely useless.

That was the Stuwgroep's ultimate aim since 1917, Federalism.

Please buff the reward.

Working on it.

EIS, MLK, and PPA would inherit all technologies INS has, all four would join "Nusantara Accord" Research Group, and also a COMECON-styled national spirits that would buffs the four.

Soekawati would also lead the State of East Indonesia, though, but you'll get rewards if you hired him before the Indies got decentralized.

By the way, do you have extensively research on this period too?

Want to know your opinion if we didn't liberate the Indonesian nationalists:
a. Should i keep Thamrin as the leader of West Indonesia, or
b. If Van Mook becomes the Council VP, he can lead the East Indies with a possibility of electing someone to replace him in an election 4 years later

In my opinion, Thamrin will still lead the country. Because possibly this decision will strengthen his leadership and strengthen his popularity.