Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
It won't be for another couple updates as I have to do testing and get permission from other modders.
Additionally, "Cores Never Expire" would be a curious implement. It'd work well in America due to the sense of nationalism all individual states have, especially if they lost their original "State" territory.
Not sure if it's really possible, but for an example having the current lands of a state be permanent cores of that country while anything it takes over time will expire.
I can change the core expiration time from 50 years for cultures without a primary nation and 150 years with a primary nation to something much longer by editing the defines.lua but I think the core time is fine and needs not to change. Plus why would you want to deal with patriot revolts in 2500 when their state had been eliminated in 1500?
Yeah I can do this, its pretty simple. I'll have to look up states that could have been formed or use some Alternate History suggestions from the Alt History Wiki.
I can probably do something like that.
Yup, but that requires redoing the map. Let me look around at some other examples of modders removing wasteland. I tend to dislike giant provinces, well the Arctic Canadian provinces are the exception, as they aren't very realistic. I'll go with the one that makes the wasteland look decent and fits with most of the needs of the extended timeline.
Well, yeah, that makes sense. Maybe nothing permanent, but some sort of work in that regard, as you said you would, will probably work just as well.
Additionally, something that bothers me is the sneaky government-form changes for some formable nations.
For example, the Pacific Islands union and the Arctic Union. Both change government form to a Kingdom, despite their predecessor being a republic.
They're both nations I would love to form in my game (I could do so with Hawaii and Nunavut, respectively,) but I don't because of that government form change.
I do like how Canada has an option between the two, but having a republic switch to a monarchy just because they made a new united realm doesn't exactly make a whole lot of sense, in my opinion.
On the note of Nunavut, any chance Alaska could be included in the Arctic (Canadian) culture-group? I don't think it is at the moment.
The way replubics are setup for the States tech group they are OP. So some formation decisions are intended to tone it down.
I don't know if it'll work because it seems like it'd make the game implode from all the AI and processing power xD Figured I'd suggest it anyways.
Each nation has its "own" RNG, that makes pretty much every decision by making rolls for them. If you cut the number of nations you cut also the large number of RNG rolls needed for the number of possible actions that can happen each day and month in the game.
I do not like the current setup for trade nodes, particularly when it comes to Appalachia and the Midwest. I don't feel that Appalachia is based on very much real and it would be more based on real trade if it were split up amongst the other nodes around it. Shelby and Memphis have always been a big part of trade along the Mississippi River and historically would belong on the Lower Mississippi Node. Davidson and Nashville, based on my experience has a much stronger economic relationship with Atlanta than say Louisville and certainly West Virginia and, alongside Hamilton/Chattanooga and Knox, would made more sense on the Savanah River Node. I do not know as much about West Virginia, I only know a bit about Tennessee (and the rest of the deep south) because I was raised in Tennessee, but I feel that most of West Virginia's economic "power" comes from coal and the way it supplies the country, especially the Rust Belt with energy, which seems best represented by Lake Erie. I might also move Ingham and Wayne to that node, representing Detroit’s part of the rust belt and its connection to Toronto and Canada also on the node. I could also argue switching Allen and Kent over also but they really are in the middle of Chicago and Pittsburg so it goes either way for them.
That leaves what should be done with Kentucky, which I am not too sure about. Fayette and Pike I think could also go with Lake Erie since Fayette has those Cincinnati suburbs and Eastern Kentucky is not all the different from West Virginia. Franklin should be on the Lake Michigan Node because of its close ties with towns in Vandenberg (and by extension, the Midwest) as a crossing point over the Ohio River. That leaves Warren which could go on the Lower Mississippi, Savanah River, or Lake Michigan node, depending on what criteria you use though I would lean to Lake Michigan because moving Warren to the Lower Mississippi node would also make you want to reconsider much of southern Illinois and while I could say Bowling Green is close to Nashville, I can't say the same for Paducah.
I know you recently reworked all of this and I do respect your work. This was just a pet peeve of mine as a played my game as Tennessee. I am no economist or anything, I just found this node odd based on my understanding of the region. If anyone disagrees with my assessment feel free to comment and correct me. I love this kind of speculation and analysis. You can take all of this as a grain of salt, I just wanted to share and help improve the mod. Thanks for taking the time to read my suggestions.