Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Sounds interesting, while a bit "unfair" maybe for strong realms like gundabad (which i dont think you can take with a small expedition" if we had some "wilderness" mountains (wilderness being a new mechanic that has now been released in out latest 3.0 patch) we could maybe make something where you could go and to that. while wilderness symbolise areas without a govermental ruler, there are still dangers like spiders, wolves and "dragons" and maybe we'll add more of these types in the future. Which i think would work better with this idea.
I'm not making any promises here but it's a good idea, and nothing is decided yet for 4.0 :)