Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Libertarian capitalists make me think of Tatoïne in Star wars. Everyone is free to have is properties (beings or things), and the only rule is money. I like it.
Mutualist cooperative is kinda the same, but with stronger moral and human rights (I must say xenos rights). A kind of utopia.
For the two others, in my opinion they must be more different than what you wrote. I agree with you that anarchist must be mainly focused on citizen rights whereas communist. But for me communist must be more focused on development and on prosperity (and militarist in the case of revolutionner)
I know it’s an easy shortcut to say that : but communist is the devotion of workers for motherland. (I may have played to much red alert ^^’ ) than anarchist don’t care about development and prosperity as long their people are free.
What your thinking of about communism is industrialist collectivist authoritarians, sort of like stalinist soviet union. the Communist revolutionary AI personalities are ment to be trotskyist or marxist internationalists, not soviet-style patriots.