Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem






Unlikely. I just don't really see a tank sized hole in the Empire roster.
They essentially already have 3 tank variants after all.
I did think about some Cathay designs and will very likely make some a reality at some point. Not necessarily tanks, but the entire "Sky Junk" angle has waaay more potential than is currently used.
But this might still be years in the future, since I don't like adding to a roster of a faction that is still in the middle of getting DLC.
I am always open for ideas I can put on my list though!
Very unlikely. Its super simple to do, but creating mini adjustment mods for everything would very quickly bloat my workshop.
I try to avoid that to remain capable of maintaining everything as well as possible.
But you are welcome to create such submods yourself.
Its a great beginner project and only requires to get used to a single column in a single table!
It has been a while that I tried it, but I would be very surprised if that would cause issues.
Most well made unit mods are so self-containing, that its almost impossible to break them with another mod.
It appears that all my mods, apart from the SFO submods, since SFO hasn't been updated yet, work fine and require no update.
It shouldn't hit much harder against large targets than the hellblaster thats a valid comparison. I think I will experiment a little in that regard. Maybe I "outsource" more of its firepower to the Bonus versus Infantry to prevent it from overperforming against large targets.
Thank you for the valuable feedback!
I agree on the Drakk Maraz, ran a few tests and nerfed it significantly. Its still strong af for the very specialized role it occupies, reflecting its high cost, but its now closer to vanilla high performing artillery units.
I tried to test the performance of the Vorkhul Drung on lords and heroes, as you described, and found not much of an issue there though. Its simply too inaccurate to really snipe small targets. Really problematic behaviour only seems to occur, when I basically park them point blank in front of the tank, which would be just as much of a terrible experience against many vanilla ranged units as well.
Thank you for your time reading and responding to my comment, and thanks again for the mod.
Auto resolve unfortunately poorly handles melee stats of ranged units. The poor melee defense stats of the tanks is essentially what kills them in Auto Resolve. I am not quite sure what to do against it, apart from just adjusting the stats into something that AR does a better job of handling.
Khrum Uzkul being difficult to build an army around is something I can understand. I use it as a staller unit for the artillery to shine. But I am not sure if thats enough either. I may look into it.
The idea that Haraz Dron is too strong surprises me though. It doesn't really do more damage than a hellfire rocket battery and is actually less accurate, due to the super long travel time of the projectiles. Unless of course you are good at making the enemy blob, then artillery like this overperforms like hell.
The problem with the Missile Damage stat is that due to how animations work and how its calculated per entity the number alone is poorly predicting how much damage potential a unit actually has. Gyrobombers are a good example for a unit that always had massive missile damage stats that rarely translated into any actual damage potential.
But I will look into the Gatling Tank. Its supposed to shredder infantry. Not one shot lords.
The missile damage stats are a little iffy, I wouldn't entirely rely on that. But its of course on purpose that regular Steam Tanks do less damage. Steam tanks are effectively chariots with infinite steam ammo and strong melee capabilities. It would be incredibly weird if Dwarf tanks would have much fewer capabilities and still perform worse in the categories they specialize in.
I am sure over time you will realize that they have more counters than you might think right now, but I am curious to hear more detailed descriptions from you regarding scenarios they perform not they way they should. So far, the gatling tank performing well against Skaven Slaves, does sound like the intented result.
I didn't test it, but it should.
Weither they are balanced is a different story though.
@Jumper2105
Allied recruitment has been added. Disclaimer though, I introduced it for almost all my mods and had no time to actually test every single unit. Just tell me if there appear to be problems.
thanks for the work you're talented as shit!
Not yet. I was busy and forgot about it.
But thanks for the reminder!
Should actually be pretty easy, I simply forgot about it and when I thought about it later I didn't have the time to test it properly. Might be something I tackle in the next days.
I will throroughly check weither my mods still work after the update the way they are supposed to anyway.
Ah, now I understand where the misconception comes from. The Vengryn Thrund animation obviously shoots three times in a row, because thats how its three barrels work. The Drakk Maraz also has an animation with three shots, but those shoot all at the same time, because its simply supposed to shoot 3 shells at once. The idea is that spreading out its damage over three projectiles that are less accurate results in less of a "coinflip" behaviour where it does either full damage or none at all. So your core issue seems to be that the three shots don't perfectly line up, which is true.
It actually uses a modified Thunderbarge shooting animation. Is this the only tank that has such a weird animation for you? I kinda struggle to come up with ideas what could result in such a strange behaviour.
I am unable to replicate the issue.
It is especially weird that whatever causes the issue for you only causes it for 2 of the 5 tanks since all of them use the exact same framework.
Is there a specific setup to make this problem reliably appear?
Its of course also possible that its just a mod conflict.
In that case I would also be interested in knowing with which mod said conflict occurs.
Its ridiculous that no matter how you move your tank the cannons just point at the opposite side so the tanks won't fire at all everytime making the tanks completely useless!
What banners exactly do you mean?
The Dwarves primarily have the artillery runes. Are those the ones you talk about?
Because those are a more complicated issue, which might also be the reason why you can't put them on Grudge Settler artillery.
I am not really able to reproduce the issue.
Are there any more hints what causes it?
Does it also crash for you in custom battles?
Against all enemies?
That you describe it crashing after it already successfully fires a few times is very weird and sounds like something else might be the issue. Maybe there are reinforcements with other broken units that arrive on the battlefield after a minute which then makes you think the Drakk Maraz crashed after doing 6 shots? Maybe another unit has a broken ability that causes the crash, but it takes them a minute to get in range and use said broken ability?
Thank you very much!
I basically put them into the aircraft category, because thats the default category for Dwarf warmachines, since all their artillery pieces are classic artillery designs.
I also think that this makes them fit better into categories like "innovation" and technologies that hint towards engineering. But it wasn't a super deep thought either.
When it comes to custom categories or missions I am always rather cautious. I try to design all my mods in a way that makes them as compatible as possible with other mods and also regarding future updates.
At some times with larger success than at other times. But fiddling with Malakais mechanics or the tech tree too much would be a lot of effort just to risk breaking the mod for anyone who uses a mod that also touches these things.
If you're feeling REALLY adventurous, you can make them their own class and give Malakai a brand new adventure for them :)
Still, I really enjoy all of your stuff, and thank you very much for everything.
That might actually be the art direction I would go for, if I did the mod again today.
I don't feel like the Dwarves need even more tanks though or that I can offer that many more interesting tank ideas.
And fundamentally changing the tanks now after many people enjoy them the way they are is something I wouldn't like to do either.
So I am not sure weither I am really going to do anything about it.
You should consider doing a mod for the "lore accurate" Dawi Tank prototype that got leaked a few years ago, that Games Workshop never launched.