@alma_negra
"Needed" is a strong word, but this mod does make it so more people join the PB depending on context!

Is this mod still needed after the new update fixing classes joining IGs?

OK for 1.9.0

Will need an update, will get back to this

ok for 1.8.6

@Alma_Negra
BPM is a pretty holistic overhaul, so im not sure how that would work

Would you make a compatability mod for BPM?

ok for 1.8.4

UPDATE 2024 Nov 28:
Mod is now compatible with mods that change the laws (add on ideology application has been move to on_action)

ok for 1.8.3

@Pamparampampamparam
I think in terms of mechanics both approach can be argued pretty easily, since that part is basegame you might wanna start a discussion about this in the official discord/forum/subreddit

Homesteading shouldn't strengthen the PB imo. It makes what should be a powerful Rural Folk IG in America a lot less of a presence, and homesteading was made basically for early-game America.

compatched with VTM

Made Switzerland and a few others start the game with monarchism already stamped out because I got William Told by @Dryhad

@Ferret Leader
1) The party preference suggestion has some merit, though fascism doesn't always have a racial component to it (Integralism, and to a lesser extent Italian fascism (as opposed to nazism)), i will give it some more thought
2) Mod covers starting laws since day 1. I did write an update that should cover civil war nations, but ill get back to you on that.

Just a suggestion, but I think that Exclusionist and Segregationist PB should prefer to join conservative parties over fascist parties. I always thought that was a bit strange.

I also think it's also not taking into account starting laws for the Segregationist/Exclusionist/Supremacist traits. It looks like I was wrong about this. Not sure if it applies to civil war nations.

@刘狗蛇
PB will only take over rural buildings under specific circumstances, and I view such cases to be accurate to history.
If your qing has homesteading or commercial agriculture, then you only have yourself to blame that the result doesn't fit history.

Maybe you should strengthen rural folk appropriately. This mod makes Petite Bourgeoisie completely occupy the living space of rural folk. When I play in a country like Brazil where plantations are the mainstay, rural folk does not exceed 5% from the beginning to the end. And I see that in a country like the Qing Empire where farmers are the majority, rural folk does not exceed 5%. This is obviously not very reasonable.

@Gunteraz
your feed back on repeated icon however, is very useful.
I was worried that it might confuse but decided to leave be.
I'm not particularly good with graphical software but i might need to break out GIMP for this occasion

Ah, you mean like events? I guess that makes sense. Didn't really think about that.

@Gunteraz
The "add-on" ideology strategy was employed to maximize compatibility.
Otherwise I will need to search for every instance of ideology_reactionary and change those, drastically increase the workload.
Sometimes the obvious solution is the wrong one.

Question: Is this mod supposed to add "ideology_republican_reactionary" to all thge petite burgeoisie IGs in countries where landowners have ideology_republican_paternalistic without removing the normal reactionary ideology first? This makes them have 2 ideologies with the same icon and one of them supports monarchy and other one opposes it. Kind of weird. I think it would be better to include all the relevant bits of normal reactionary in the ideology_republican_reactionary and then fully replace old one rather than double up.

@ClawedAsh
Yes

Will this mod be updated to 1.5 when Victoria Tweaks is?

Awesome, thanks