Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
This may be too much of an ask, but I was wondering if it was possible to make an addition to the "lovers amount" precept? I'd love if there was a precept that allowed just the Leader pawn to have X amount of lovers, but still have other pawns be limited for theirs? Like a concubine sort of situation. No worries if not! Thanks for making, and continuing to update, this awesome mod!
@Pentasis You cannot force someone to initiate a hook up outside their orientation, but they can choose to do it on their own. Check the FAQ for more details on the situations where this is possible. The 12% on the woman's tooltip is the chance the gay man will say yes if she asks him. 12.5% is the highest it can be without the woman having the pretty or beautiful trait.
Done and done. Thanks for here and on your discord!
I'm seeing hoookup chances as low due to age difference, but that differnce isn't meant to matter much for the Takala because they stay alive for a very long time.
or only prevents marriage as you said
That being said, I am working on a complete rework to separate romantic and sexual attraction. This requires moving to a comp system, but I'm trying to do it in such a way that users won't notice. Pawns will still have a trait that shows their orientation. I've been working on this for over a year, so perhaps you can understand why I didn't want to do this until it was necessary.