Install Steam
login
|
language
简体中文 (Simplified Chinese)
繁體中文 (Traditional Chinese)
日本語 (Japanese)
한국어 (Korean)
ไทย (Thai)
Български (Bulgarian)
Čeština (Czech)
Dansk (Danish)
Deutsch (German)
Español - España (Spanish - Spain)
Español - Latinoamérica (Spanish - Latin America)
Ελληνικά (Greek)
Français (French)
Italiano (Italian)
Bahasa Indonesia (Indonesian)
Magyar (Hungarian)
Nederlands (Dutch)
Norsk (Norwegian)
Polski (Polish)
Português (Portuguese - Portugal)
Português - Brasil (Portuguese - Brazil)
Română (Romanian)
Русский (Russian)
Suomi (Finnish)
Svenska (Swedish)
Türkçe (Turkish)
Tiếng Việt (Vietnamese)
Українська (Ukrainian)
Report a translation problem
Concerning the word "Romans" I stay true to myself and I see the Eastern Roman empire as Roman. Fully roman, in term of institutions and law. The fact that they were not "italian" is totally irrelevant to my eyes. The term "Byzantine" on the other hand is a modern XIXth century invention. They never called themselves Byzantines. The European kingdoms called them romans (the term "Greeks" came later, at the end of the empire), and even their Turc enemies at the end continued to call them romans, "roumi".
It's a documentary of roughly 14 minutes about the Viking Harald Hardrada, leader of the Byzantine Varangian Guard
Thank to modern archeaology we have now a better understanding of what these people really were. Assuming that we still want to use that awful term: "viking", unclear, and refering to false ideas of the past. I prefer myself Northmen, but well...
Finally, I'll quote here for you the rune stone of Dalum where a father mourns the loss of his two sons:
eR:uaþr.tuþr uest : en.anar : austr
(one of them died in the west, the other in the east)
Trying to put such a complex world within modern "boxes" is silly. And above all, History should never be used to support a political agenda or a dirty nationalism.
As for the Varangian guard, its ethnicty has changed a lot during history. The first varangian guard were from northern Europe, and there have been Russians among them, most probably. Later on, after 1066 there were even Anglo-saxons recruited in the Varangian guard.
Anyway, saying that the Varangian guard is not viking is stupid and historically totally false. They were mainly scandinavian until the XIth century. And if you refer to "Vikings" only when these northern Europe men operated in the west, it is also... plain stupid, as they moved all over modern Russia, and were active traders between the Ladoga up to the Volga, and mercenaries in Byzantium, southern Italy, Sicily...
So far, after testing, the battles are less boring: waiting for the enemy to engage out defense force for 5+ minutes was ... dull. Seems to be more fluid.
Of course it's easy, cheated, whatever... but damn, if you play with the very hard difficulty, it's so intense. The Sassanid Empire wanted to attack Amida and Edesse, they attacked maybe 15 times, each time I managed to defend, but the last attack was fatal to me: I lost the province! And now they are allied with another persian faction and they start to attack Anatoly!
It's really intense: each turn I have a bit battle :)