Steamをインストール
ログイン
|
言語
简体中文(簡体字中国語)
繁體中文(繁体字中国語)
한국어 (韓国語)
ไทย (タイ語)
български (ブルガリア語)
Čeština(チェコ語)
Dansk (デンマーク語)
Deutsch (ドイツ語)
English (英語)
Español - España (スペイン語 - スペイン)
Español - Latinoamérica (スペイン語 - ラテンアメリカ)
Ελληνικά (ギリシャ語)
Français (フランス語)
Italiano (イタリア語)
Bahasa Indonesia(インドネシア語)
Magyar(ハンガリー語)
Nederlands (オランダ語)
Norsk (ノルウェー語)
Polski (ポーランド語)
Português(ポルトガル語-ポルトガル)
Português - Brasil (ポルトガル語 - ブラジル)
Română(ルーマニア語)
Русский (ロシア語)
Suomi (フィンランド語)
Svenska (スウェーデン語)
Türkçe (トルコ語)
Tiếng Việt (ベトナム語)
Українська (ウクライナ語)
翻訳の問題を報告
Don't get me wrong, I wholeheartedly applaud what you've done, and it might inspire the devs. It's just a shame that it's as unreliable as it is.
I don't make maps myself for Distance, but I can imagine that making good maps is no walk in the park.
From what I can tell, the detection sphere is below the bottom of the object, or at the very least right at the bottom which makes it very hard to precisely line it up.
On top of that, the detection area seems to change depending on the angle the pad is pointing, putting one on a wall needs a detection area about 10 units (meters?) bigger.
Aside from that, I can still usually manage to complete this track without any crashes, I just make sure I line up as straight as I can on the jump pads and go onto them at full speed, as that's how I've aimed the pads. You do need to manipulate your car in the air a bit though, which isn't the easiest thing to do.